#Sunday 17 March 2002 14:07# Message from Don Cox:
> On 15-Mar-02, Steve Shireman wrote:
>
> > Alan says that the mainstream software is very "brittle" and does not
> > scale well. Are you brave enough to enter a house built using the
> > techniques that "modern" software engineers are using to b
On 15-Mar-02, Steve Shireman wrote:
> Alan says that the mainstream software is very "brittle" and does not
> scale well. Are you brave enough to enter a house built using the
> techniques that "modern" software engineers are using to build
> software?
> (Of course not!)
This results from inappr
Jason,
by "rocks" I meant all of the following: [ "high-tech-cool" "you are
Peter, and upon this rock I build my..." "solid as a rock" "rock and
roll is here to stay"] since rocks are very commonly incoporated into
architecture, especially ones that last.
Rebol takes the fragile-ness out of I
> I think Steve is referring here to IOS. It's hard to explain it, but it is
> really great stuff, and is changing the way I think about a lot of design,
> development, and communication issues.
Yes I imagend that's the bit I want to hear..
why great?
what changes
etc..
Has any one articulated
On 16-Mar-02, Petr Krenzelok wrote:
> Porter Woodward wrote:
>> Personally, I'm a huge fan of Mozilla 0.98+ (now .99) and IE 5/6.
>> Both browsers are fast, render pages well, and very compatible with
>> one another. NS 4.x version are all terrible - as a web
>> applications developer, it's a ma
Hi Jason,
<< Would someone please step up and describe to me lucidly what makes Rebol
"the architecture for the Internet that rocks" >>
I think Steve is referring here to IOS. It's hard to explain it, but it is
really great stuff, and is changing the way I think about a lot of design,
developmen
Porter Woodward wrote:
>Personally, I'm a huge fan of Mozilla 0.98+ (now .99) and IE 5/6. Both
>browsers are fast, render pages well, and very compatible with one another.
>NS 4.x version are all terrible - as a web applications developer, it's a
>major hassle to code for NS 4.x - both in terms
> Alan says that the mainstream software is very "brittle" and does not
> scale well. Are you brave enough to enter a house built using the
> techniques that "modern" software engineers are using to build software?
> (Of course not!)
..well if my house is an igloo, who do you reckon I should
ca
Hi,
> The reasons that Netscape and Internet Explorer have become unusable and
> unstable (so users have upgradaphobia) roots itself in something I heard
> Alan Kay say in a video talk, "The Computer Revolution Hasn't Started
> Yet" which Jim Collas has never returned to me ;-(
Even though it so
You're both wrong and you're both right.
The reasons that Netscape and Internet Explorer have become unusable and
unstable (so users have upgradaphobia) roots itself in something I heard
Alan Kay say in a video talk, "The Computer Revolution Hasn't Started
Yet" which Jim Collas has never retur
inux users. "
>
> I rest my case.
>
> TB
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 6:52 AM
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: Browser gripe
>
> > Brett:
> > > The browser share
Ryan,
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> AOL's and M$ business plans appear to be heading into direct conflict, M$
with
> hailstorm and AOL with Red Hat. I dont see AOL wanting to depend on M$
for
> even a dial tone. If AOL does decide to keep using IE for AOL
Have you tried Konqueror?
- Original Message -
From: Brett Handley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 6:43 AM
Subject: [REBOL] Browser gripe was - Re: Serial Communications - GPS Sings!
> Hmm Like Joel I'm using Netscape. I did try to load Netsc
Terry:
> "But don't hold your breath. No AOL employee we have talked to, at any
> level, claims knowledge of any current or future plans to offer AOL client
> software for Linux users. "
>
> I rest my case.
I think the point to take from this is that AOL are dismissing Linux as a
minority i
CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 6:52 AM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: Browser gripe
> Brett:
> > The browser share statistics were interesting and powerful
(interestingly
> > the statistics seem to encouraging more sites to be unreadable in
> Netscape).
&g
March 15, 2002 6:52 AM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: Browser gripe
> Brett:
> > The browser share statistics were interesting and powerful
(interestingly
> > the statistics seem to encouraging more sites to be unreadable in
> Netscape).
> > That said though, I reject (working with
Brett:
> The browser share statistics were interesting and powerful (interestingly
> the statistics seem to encouraging more sites to be unreadable in
Netscape).
> That said though, I reject (working within my limited webpage capability)
> locking off access to non-IE users to codeconscious.co
17 matches
Mail list logo
