[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-18 Thread Maarten Koopmans
Hey Jeff, Didn't know you were a physicist too :) ops, blown my cover... --Maarten - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 5:53 PM Subject: [REBOL] Re: Compression > > > Hello, EA

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-18 Thread jeff
Hello, EAT: > don't knock it, genius is heaven born. i happen to know > that it is possible to design and build an npmg (near > perpetual motion generator) ... You've aroused my curiosity... how NEAR to perpetual motion are we talking? Like almost perpetual? Real close to perpetual? J

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-18 Thread Gisle Dankel
Strange. Do you have a different calendar system where you live? 1st of April has long passed in this part of the world :) Gisle On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Paul Tretter wrote: > > Coming soon! Image putting greater than 3600 CD's worth of data on a floppy disk. >Or take a Gigabyte worth of data

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-17 Thread Joel Neely
Ryan Cole wrote: > > Joel Neely wrote: > > > > > > ... Although the sequence "3/7" is a valid encoding for... > > > > 0.42857142857142857142857142857142857142857142857... > > > > ... I challenge you to find an equally compact encoding for... > > > > 0.4285714285714285714285714285714285

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-17 Thread Terry Brownell
Have faith in the impossible? Next thing you'll be telling us is XML is the answer to the semantic web! :) TBrownell - Original Message - From: "Erin Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 2:38 PM Subje

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-17 Thread Ryan Cole
Joel Neely wrote: > > It doesn't matter. Although the sequence "3/7" is a valid encoding > for the infinite message > > 0.42857142857142857142857142857142857142857142857... > > (and therefore highly efficient ;-) I challenge you to find an > equally compact encoding for the highly-similar m

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-17 Thread Erin Thomas
don't knock it, genius is heaven born. i happen to know that it is possible to design and build an npmg (near perpetual motion generator) ... such things break all the rules and do not conform to how anyone sees anything "today". watch, this compression utility will work and it will be fast

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-17 Thread Joel Neely
It's a good thing this thread was posted to the REBOL mailing list instead of a hard-core tech list like cypherpunks (at least before it got covered over with spam). Those folks had NO patience with technical faux pas nor naiveté. First, let's remember the difference between lossy and lossless (

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-17 Thread Ryan Cole
Terry Brownell wrote: > That's like saying how many megs of data can Pi produce. > > TBrownell Exactly my point. So far it seems to be an awful lot. I would say the real problem is that 3 bytes can only contain about 1.7 million different combinations, so at maximum, only that number of docume

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-17 Thread Terry Brownell
That's like saying how many megs of data can Pi produce. TBrownell - Original Message - From: "Ryan Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 11:38 AM Subject: [REBOL] Re: Compression > While I tend to think Paul

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-17 Thread Ryan Cole
While I tend to think Paul is mistaken, take in mind that fractal generators may be infinitely small compared to the data that they can produce. 3 / 7 is liberally 3 bytes, how many megs of data can it produce? --Ryan Terry Brownell wrote: > 2000 megs = 400 bytes or > 20 megs = 4 bytes > > Eve

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-17 Thread Terry Brownell
2000 megs = 400 bytes or 20 megs = 4 bytes Even the word "vapour" as in "vapourware" is 6 bytes. T Brownell -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-17 Thread Mat Bettinson
Heya Paul, PT> I tried talking to math professionals looking for an answer but PT> couldnt get one. None of them explained the laws of entropy to you then? -- Mat Bettinson - EuroGamer's Gaming Evangelist with a Goatee http://www.eurogamer.net | http://www.eurogamer-network.com -- To unsubs

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-17 Thread Vos, Doug
When can I buy a copy? -Original Message- From: Paul Tretter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 1:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [REBOL] Re: Compression Wow that sounds like a big number. Actually though its more like 65 terabytes given some of REBOL&#

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-17 Thread Paul Tretter
much more agressively with a prototype. Paul Tretter - Original Message - From: "Ryan Cole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 12:17 PM Subject: [REBOL] Re: Compression > Paul, > I am sure you can understand that most peopl

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-17 Thread Mat Bettinson
Heya Paul, PT> Actually I expected that kind of remark. :) I also expect more of the same PT> and looked in the mirror several times asking similiar questions. Don't worry, the effects wear off after awhile. -- Mat Bettinson - EuroGamer's Gaming Evangelist with a Goatee http://www.eurogamer.n

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-17 Thread ryan . christiansen
Well, best of luck! At least make C|Net aware of your compression utility and give REBOL lots of credit. :) Paul wrote... However, I for example put an entire CD image on a website (compress to less than 400 bytes) then download it over a dialup line and uncompress it very easily with very litt

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-17 Thread Ryan Cole
Paul, I am sure you can understand that most people have a hard time believing you, as you may have guessed. If I did not know you, I would be be laughing at you. Bypassing argument of whether or not you are correct, how far have you gotten? What sort of time does it to compress something? G

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-17 Thread Paul Tretter
From: "Terry Brownell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 11:38 AM Subject: [REBOL] Re: Compression > I find this a bit hard to swallow. > > 2,340 Gigabytes on one floppy? > > Pull that one off SUCCESSFULLY and I'

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-17 Thread Paul Tretter
t; Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 11:54 AM Subject: [REBOL] Re: Compression > Heya Paul, > > PT> Imagine with 400 byes of compressed data (representing a gig or > PT> more) what this could mean to handheld devices like portable mp3 > PT> players or digital cameras. The

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-17 Thread Mat Bettinson
Heya Paul, PT> Imagine with 400 byes of compressed data (representing a gig or PT> more) what this could mean to handheld devices like portable mp3 PT> players or digital cameras. The capablity to store your entire mp3 PT> collection in a portable device. Is it especially good crack where you co

[REBOL] Re: Compression

2001-04-17 Thread Terry Brownell
I find this a bit hard to swallow. 2,340 Gigabytes on one floppy? Pull that one off SUCCESSFULLY and I'll see you get the Nobel Prize. T Brownell - Original Message - From: "Paul Tretter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 9:14