Hi Ladislav,
On Wednesday, May 29, 2002, 11:31:47 PM, you wrote:
LM> just a question: is there really a solution (not a joke), that would work
LM> differently than Romano suggested?
Not that I know of.
Regards,
Gabriele.
--
Gabriele Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- REBOL Programmer
Amigan
Hi Gabriele,
just a question: is there really a solution (not a joke), that would work
differently than Romano suggested?
Ciao
-L
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
Hi Anton,
On Tuesday, May 28, 2002, 6:44:53 PM, you wrote:
A> How about this?
A> a: does [mut-equal1?: func [a b][no]]
A> Is that a special enough property for you? :)
LOL ok I was only lucky to get to think about the right function
in so few time. :)
Anyway it's much simpler than it lo
For my joke to work, I actually needed this:
a: does [mut-equal1?: func [a b][yes] ""]
and here's a useful
print [
identical? a b
same? a b
equal-state? a b
strict-equal? a b
equal? a b
How about this?
a: does [mut-equal1?: func [a b][no]]
Is that a special enough property for you? :)
Grr
Anton.
> Hi Romano,
>
> On Monday, May 27, 2002, 11:53:27 PM, you wrote:
>
> RPT> What is 'a?
>
> I expected it to be more difficult to find out. :) But then I got
> to think about a
Hi, Anton
> Is this an unsolved problem
No
> or do you know the answer
> and you are challenging us to also find out ?
Yes :-)
---
Ciao
Romano
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
Hi Romano,
On Monday, May 27, 2002, 11:53:27 PM, you wrote:
RPT> What is 'a?
I expected it to be more difficult to find out. :) But then I got
to think about a function with a special property... ;-)
Regards,
Gabriele.
--
Gabriele Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- REBOL Programmer
Amigan
Hi Anton,
Romano's enigma has got a known solution. It is just a challenge for you to
find out.
Ciao
-L
- Original Message -
From: "Anton"
Is this an unsolved problem or do you know the answer
and you are challenging us to also find out ?
Anton.
> I have an enigma about Ladislav's mu
Hi, Ladislav
> nice. Thanks for pointing that out. I will let the others to find the
> solution.
Very very fast!
I 'd like to see your solution.
> Do you think that I should modify MUT-EQUAL1? a bit to correct this?
I do not think it is a bug, mut-equal1 "sees" an identity that no other
funct
BTW, I found an error in the EQUAL-STATE? function as well.
Ciao
-L
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
Hi Romano,
nice. Thanks for pointing that out. I will let the others to find the
solution.
Do you think that I should modify MUT-EQUAL1? a bit to correct this?
Ciao
-L
- Original Message -
From: "Romano Paolo Tenca"
Hi,
I have an enigma about Ladislav's mut-equal1? (from
http://www.r
Is this an unsolved problem or do you know the answer
and you are challenging us to also find out ?
Anton.
> Hi,
>
> I have an enigma about Ladislav's mut-equal1? (from
> http://www.rebolforces.com/~ladislav/evaluation.html)
>
> b ;== "1"
> string? b ;== true
> identical? a b ;== false
> same?
12 matches
Mail list logo
