> More recently, I've started defining "bare objects" without
> assigning a name in the file, such as
>
> REBOL [
> ...
> ]
>
> make object! [
> ...
> ]
Interesting. Yes that's the way Vanilla formats all the dynasnips in /apps
./Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this
Hi SunandaDH,
On Monday, March 18, 2002, 1:35:12 AM, you wrote:
Sac> I don't know an easy way to tell if a word has changed -- but if you are
>> query/clear system/words
== [end! unset! error! datatype! context! native! action! routine! op! function!
object! struct! library! por
t! any-type! a
Hi, Norman,
This isn't exactly an answer to the question as you posed it,
but here's something I do that helps deal with the situation.
Rather than having a REBOL file (*.r) contain a collection of
various parts, I prefer to
1) make sure that a single source file contains components
of a s
> I don't know an easy way to tell if a word has changed -- but if you are
> running an untrusted script, 'protect has got to be basic insurance.I
> suppose you could make a block of all words which are functions, and their
> molded checksum. After loading the script, check again to see if
Hi Norman,
<< When loading or reading a file I would like to know ALL
the functions, blocks, etc..that where actived while loading the
file. There is no such command like "source loaded-script"
(Im now always using [ loaded: read %example.r ]) but thats a too
workaround.. >>
I think someone did
Norman:
> When loading or reading a file I would like to know ALL
> the functions, blocks, etc..that where actived while loading the
> file. There is no such command like "source loaded-script"
> (Im now always using [ loaded: read %example.r ]) but thats a too
> workaround..
I'm no guru her
