[REBOL] Re: REBOL/BASE testing

2002-10-16 Thread Petr Krenzelok
Jason Cunliffe wrote: >>Yes, wait for the probably free FastCGI protocol from DocKimbel - it >>will be 10 times faster at least ;-) >> >> > >Will that run on any REBOL installation? > >./Jason > > > I hope so ... it will be just it - rebol script - no additional libraries. Once released,

[REBOL] Re: REBOL/BASE testing

2002-10-15 Thread Brett Handley
As far as I'm aware, it is not really released - it is an Alpha version meant for testing. Brett. - Original Message - From: "Gregg Irwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:00 AM Subject: [REBOL] Re: REBOL

[REBOL] Re: REBOL/BASE testing

2002-10-15 Thread Gregg Irwin
Hi Norman, << Just out of currio.. What is rebol/base?? >> Carl S. posted it a couple weeks ago. It's basically a stripped down version or Core that is designed to boot faster for CGI use and use less memory for small devices (< 600K base memory footprint). It's available at http://www.reboltec

[REBOL] Re: REBOL/BASE testing

2002-10-15 Thread nodep
Citeren RebOldes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi reboldes, Just out of currio.. What is rebol/base?? Seems im always missing the latest news flashes... :-) (R)egards, Norman. -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the qu

[REBOL] Re: REBOL/BASE testing

2002-10-15 Thread Jason Cunliffe
> Yes, wait for the probably free FastCGI protocol from DocKimbel - it > will be 10 times faster at least ;-) Will that run on any REBOL installation? ./Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.

[REBOL] Re: REBOL/BASE testing

2002-10-15 Thread Gregg Irwin
Hi Graham, << Why do you think it is faster? Is it because it loads faster being a smaller binary? >> Per Carl S., things like network protocols can take a bit of time to load, along with lots of other functions you may not need. So you add back in only the pieces that you're using and elimina

[REBOL] Re: REBOL/BASE testing

2002-10-15 Thread Andreas Bolka
Saturday, October 12, 2002, 6:38:21 PM, RebOldes wrote: > As you can see the Rebol/BASE is almost 3 times faster. It really > worhts to rewrite some of the server-side scripts to be runable with > it:-)) i would rewrite a lot of them, if only rebol/base was available for linux/unix. -- Best r

[REBOL] Re: REBOL/BASE testing

2002-10-15 Thread Graham Chiu
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002 19:38:21 +0200 RebOldes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >As you can see the Rebol/BASE is almost 3 times faster. >It really worhts to >rewrite some of the server-side scripts to be runable >with it:-)) Hi, Why do you think it is faster? Is it because it loads faster being a

[REBOL] Re: REBOL/BASE testing

2002-10-15 Thread RebOldes
R> As you can see the Rebol/BASE is almost 3 times faster. It really worhts to R> rewrite some of the server-side scripts to be runable with it:-)) but the problem may be, that there is no Linux version of Rebol/Base yet :( -- >>do [send to-email join 'oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] "BESsssT REgAr

[REBOL] Re: REBOL/BASE testing

2002-10-15 Thread Petr Krenzelok
RebOldes wrote: >Hello rebol-list, > > I've finally found some time to test the Rebol/base... > I choosed one of my cgi scripts and set the Rebol/base as the > interpreter, I had to add decode-cgi function to this script to make > it working and run this simple test: > > > >>>t: now/time/pr