Well, I would assume you would catch the error,
and then try to apply your own parse rules.
You would have to try to split paths up, then
reapply the load/catch/try-to-parse cycle on the
pieces.
Or your code could avoid path notation altogether,
using pick, eg. pick d i._x
then you don't have to
Hello Gabriele,
Thursday, December 18, 2003, 10:42:33 AM, you wrote:
GS> Hi rebOldes,
GS> On Tuesday, December 16, 2003, 6:09:34 PM, you wrote:
r>> I can, but it's much more slower and it would mean to make it
r>> completely again. Maybe I could use load/next but how to convert
r>> invalid wo
Hello Gabriele,
Thursday, December 18, 2003, 10:42:33 AM, you wrote:
GS> Hi rebOldes,
GS> On Tuesday, December 16, 2003, 6:09:34 PM, you wrote:
r>> I can, but it's much more slower and it would mean to make it
r>> completely again. Maybe I could use load/next but how to convert
r>> invalid wo
On 18-Dec-03, Gabriele Santilli wrote:
> Hi rebOldes,
> On Tuesday, December 16, 2003, 6:09:34 PM, you wrote:
>> I can, but it's much more slower and it would mean to make it
>> completely again. Maybe I could use load/next but how to convert
>> invalid word to word?
>>> to word! "whatever you
Hi rebOldes,
On Tuesday, December 16, 2003, 6:09:34 PM, you wrote:
r> I can, but it's much more slower and it would mean to make it
r> completely again. Maybe I could use load/next but how to convert
r> invalid word to word?
>> to word! "whatever you wish"
== whatever you wish
>> to word! "1,4"
Hello Carl,
Tuesday, December 16, 2003, 8:45:56 AM, you wrote:
CR> On 16-Dec-03, rebOldes wrote:
>> Hello Carl,
>> As you are preparing new build of Rebol, I would like to ask you, If
>> it would be possible to change somehow handling of "invalid
>> datatypes"
>> As I'm working on a probably
Hello Gabriele,
Tuesday, December 16, 2003, 10:35:37 AM, you wrote:
GS> Hi rebOldes,
GS> On Monday, December 15, 2003, 2:50:06 PM, you wrote:
r>> I think the best way would be to handle these 'invalid' words as a
r>> special word which would not be able to hold some values but I would
r>> be
Hi rebOldes,
On Monday, December 15, 2003, 2:50:06 PM, you wrote:
r> I think the best way would be to handle these 'invalid' words as a
r> special word which would not be able to hold some values but I would
r> be able to parse this word as a normal string.
You can use string parsing and then
On 16-Dec-03, rebOldes wrote:
> Hello Carl,
> As you are preparing new build of Rebol, I would like to ask you, If
> it would be possible to change somehow handling of "invalid
> datatypes"
> As I'm working on a probably the largest known dialect using Rebol -
> the Rebol/Flash dialect ( http:/
