[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-06-12 Thread RebOldes
Hello pat665, Sunday, June 2, 2002, 3:54:34 PM, you wrote: p> So which is yours ? Server: RedHat with Apache desktop: WinNT4 with Apache I have no problems with moving scripts from Win to Lin and vice versa (just use a simple script for replacing paths in the files to fit in the target e

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-06-03 Thread Tim Johnson
* pat665 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020602 06:23]: > Hi rebollers, > > I am just curious what system is used by the rebol community. I was a > Windows guy, and I am "starting a new life" with Linux. > > So which is yours ? > Patrick Hi Patrick: My main workstation is Linux Red Hat 7.2 running

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-06-03 Thread Mark Chang
Desktop for program development: Win2k Work server for running Rebol program: Linux 7.1 > Hi rebollers, > > I am just curious what system is used by the rebol community. I was a > Windows guy, and I am "starting a new life" with Linux. > > So which is yours ? > > Patrick > > PS: Some will no

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-06-03 Thread Gregg Irwin
Hi Pat, << I am just curious what system is used by the rebol community. I was a Windows guy, and I am "starting a new life" with Linux. >> W2K. --Gregg -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-06-02 Thread Laurence Giddings
Win95 at work Previously Win2000 at home, I am running MacOS/X now and waiting waiting waiting for RT to release view for it, like a few other people I know :) regards Laurence On Sunday, June 2, 2002, at 11:54 , pat665 wrote: > Hi rebollers, > > I am just curious what system is used by

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-06-02 Thread Rod Gaither
>> I am just curious what system is used by the rebol community. I was a >> Windows guy, and I am "starting a new life" with Linux. > > Win95 at work > Win2000 and RedHat7.2 at home > MacOS/X if RT ever release view for it (Wintel boxes are really noisy > once > you remove the background noise!)

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-06-02 Thread atruter
> I am just curious what system is used by the rebol community. I was a > Windows guy, and I am "starting a new life" with Linux. Win95 at work Win2000 and RedHat7.2 at home MacOS/X if RT ever release view for it (Wintel boxes are really noisy once you remove the background noise!) Regards,

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-06-02 Thread Jason Cunliffe
> I am just curious what system is used by the rebol community. I was a > Windows guy, and I am "starting a new life" with Linux. > > So which is yours ? server: RedHat 7.2 laptop: Win98 -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the sub

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-06-02 Thread Anton
I am still running Windows 2k, but plan to shift over to linux at an appropriate moment. (Probably the next major hard disk crash.) Rebol Technology tend to release their latest beta offerings on windows first, and linux a close second. Anton. > Hi rebollers, > > I am just curious what system i

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-02-05 Thread Brian Wilson
NO REBOL CONTENT HERE! SORRY If your machine has NT, Win2000. or XP on it, (or Linux,) you should also consider using 'vmware'. It costs about $300. I use the linux version and it saves me from having to own many systems. I have a RH Linux, Win 98, NT Server, and Win 2000 all concurrently install

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-02-05 Thread Charles
> And that is something I really don't understand. RT has to have possible /Pro > sales in mind, or I just don't understand it, as /View itself is free (at least > for non-commercial usage) ... Yeah. Well, I guess they don't anticipate enough /Pro sales to justify stranding people on the QNX p

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-02-04 Thread Brett Handley
Hi Phil, > As I work from home I really cant afford to be without my machine for too long. > And I dont want to really have to re-install all my software. I suggest you invest in another machine - second hand perhaps. This strategy takes all the risk out, saves time waiting for re-boots, ad

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-02-04 Thread Jason Cunliffe
ED]> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:35 AM Subject: [REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux > Hi Jason, > > I would have tried this all long ago if I was free to wipe my hard disk. > However I have to run Wondoze for my work. > As I work from home I really cant afford to be without m

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux/partition magic

2002-02-04 Thread Tim Johnson
* Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020204 01:25]: > Tim Johnson wrote: > > > >Partition Magic comes with most linux distros... I stand corrected. I used Partition Magic generically. sorry (I think "Refrigerator" was at one time a legal name, or so my folks say) :>) > No it doesn't. Partition Mag

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-02-04 Thread philb
Hi Jason, I would have tried this all long ago if I was free to wipe my hard disk. However I have to run Wondoze for my work. As I work from home I really cant afford to be without my machine for too long. And I dont want to really have to re-install all my software. I read a bit about fips

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-02-04 Thread Jason Cunliffe
> I want to test my Rebol scripts on Linux. > Dont want to start a flame war but can anyone suggest a *simple* Linux installation, one that preferably has partitioning as part of the setup, or even doesnt need partitioning. > > I was considering RedHat 7.2 but this may be overkill for wh

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux/partition magic

2002-02-04 Thread Chris
Tim Johnson wrote: > Partition Magic comes with most linux distros... No it doesn't. Partition Magic is a commercial program, I know of no distro that ships it. There are native linux tools which do the same job: Mandrake has DiskDrake and RedHat has DiskDruid (IIRC) for example. Chris --

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux/partition magic

2002-02-03 Thread philb
Hi Tim/Charles I was aware that I may need to partition my hard drive. I do have a partion tool ACRONIS OS Selector which repartions without destroying the whole hard drive. But if the distro comes with Partition Magic then I would prefer to use that (its the one everyone recomends). Does in

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-02-03 Thread Petr Krenzelok
Charles wrote: > Since Mandrake is, fundamentally, RedHat+. There are, of course, a > billion options out there. Now that we got a CD-RW drive hooked into our > broadband box, I'm going to try downloading every one I can which has an ISO > and burn it for testing. BeOS, if you're intere

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux/partition magic

2002-02-03 Thread Charles
Phil: Tim speaks good words. Heed them ;) I'd have to say that, especially if you weren't immersed in DOS in your formative years, Linux will have a curve to contend with. Even installation can be an adventure - just be thankful you don't have to know your disk's geometry and be able to cal

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-02-03 Thread Scot
Hi, I just did what you want to do a few days ago. I installed Mandrake linux on my laptop and used Partition Magic to create the new partitions. PMagic was nice because it actually had an option for creating a linux partition. When I installed Mandrake Linux there were absolutely no problems.

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux/partition magic

2002-02-03 Thread Tim Johnson
* Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020203 20:47]: > Phil: > >Before we get too far into this, I just want to make sure that you > understand that, in most cases, partitioning a drive results in the > destruction of ALL contents of the drive. There are a couple tools out > there which can partiti

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-02-03 Thread Charles
Since Mandrake is, fundamentally, RedHat+. There are, of course, a billion options out there. Now that we got a CD-RW drive hooked into our broadband box, I'm going to try downloading every one I can which has an ISO and burn it for testing. BeOS, if you're interested, runs within the WInd

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-02-03 Thread Charles
Phil: Before we get too far into this, I just want to make sure that you understand that, in most cases, partitioning a drive results in the destruction of ALL contents of the drive. There are a couple tools out there which can partition without destroying contents. Just wanted to make sure

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-02-03 Thread Tim Johnson
* Christian Morency <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020203 14:33]: > Hi, > > I would strongly suggest Mandrake, which has a GUI installation, offer > partitionning, etc... it's very simple to install. I agree. And pretty much anything that I said about RH goes for Mandrake. -- Tim Johnso

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-02-03 Thread Tim Johnson
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020203 12:11]: > Hi, > > I want to test my Rebol scripts on Linux. > Dont want to start a flame war but can anyone suggest a *simple* Linux >installation, > one that preferably has partitioning as part of the setup, or even doesnt need >partitionin

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-02-03 Thread Christian Morency
Hi, I would strongly suggest Mandrake, which has a GUI installation, offer partitionning, etc... it's very simple to install. Best, Chris > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 8:31 PM

[REBOL] Re: Rebol & Linux

2002-02-03 Thread Andy York
I have a RedHat/Apache/PHP/REBOL machine up and running. Rebol works fine...just takes a bit of getting used to at first. My first Linux server...appears to be very stable, haven't had much time to work with it lately. ay -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE