Terry wrote:
> While poking away here, I recieved this strange string for a value to one
of my 'words...
>
> "imanXwin kludge"
>
> I have no idea where this came from??
I think that's a bug. Send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . I've come across it
before, but couldn't track it down.
Andrew Martin
ICQ:
is makes sense to all...
-MAx
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 5:49 AM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: Strange behaviour in Make object?
> RE: [REBOL] Re: Strange behaviour in Make object?
>
> I think RT handles
RE: [REBOL] Re: Strange behaviour in Make object?
I think RT handles this somewhat lazy.
when accessing objects from c, its easier and faster to
do this by index instead of searching the object for name
(i think).
with 'port! they have a clean solution.
'port! is like an object, but c
Brett Handley said:
> Hi James,
>
> I can't shed any light on it. But I do suggest that rather using MAKE
> OBJECT! directly you use MAKE FACE
> so that you are assured of having the correct View fields constructed
> properly.
>
> There is some evidence to suggest that the View engine interfaces
Hi James,
I can't shed any light on it. But I do suggest that rather using MAKE
OBJECT! directly you use MAKE FACE
so that you are assured of having the correct View fields constructed
properly.
There is some evidence to suggest that the View engine interfaces with these
objects in a low level w
