> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Gregg Irwin
> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 7:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: business object definitions
> Agreed. I'm not saying we should use IOS f
Hi Robert,
<< I don't know much about IOS at the moment and it might take some time to
arrive. Therefore I take what I have at hand and IMO it's sufficient to get
started. The collection of business-object descriptions should be
"technology"
independent (in the way, that it doesn't matter, which
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Gregg Irwin
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 7:40 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: business object definitions
> The key, I think, is IOS.
Hi, I don't
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> John Sequeira
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 4:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: business object definitions/where to start
> Also, for more generic busin
On Friday 05 October 2001 14:25, you wrote:
> Not that I'm a great lover of XML but http://www.syncml.org/ details some
> schemas for vCARD etc...
Better yet are the RFCs:
vCard: 2425, 2426
vCal (iCal): 2445, 2446, 2447
Best to build on the framework than from the top down IMO.
--
To unsubscri
