[REBOL] Re: css vs View (VID) compositing? (was) Re: Re: page-breaks in html or pdf?

2003-12-07 Thread bry
> > > > OTOH - studying css docs for one day I have to say that it is way more > > > complicated than View. Maybe just a question of becoming used to > > > different concept? What do others think? > well styling in View always struck me as a weak css, then again I don't tend to use Rebol fo

[REBOL] Re: css vs View (VID) compositing? (was) Re: Re: page-breaks in html or pdf?

2003-12-06 Thread A J Martin
pekr wrote: > huh, didn't know it is possible to "style" tag? I thought that is why there is tag available? Styling the tag gave better page breaks than styling . Andrew J Martin Speaking in tongues and performing miracles. ICQ: 26227169 http://www.rebol.it/Valley/ http://valley.orcon.net.nz/

[REBOL] Re: css vs View (VID) compositing? (was) Re: Re: page-breaks in html or pdf?

2003-12-06 Thread Jason Cunliffe
> > OTOH - studying css docs for one day I have to say that it is way more > > complicated than View. Maybe just a question of becoming used to > > different concept? What do others think? CSS has the huge advantage of being widely used and documented - books tutorials communities. Alas, most of

[REBOL] Re: css vs View (VID) compositing? (was) Re: Re: page-breaks in html or pdf?

2003-12-06 Thread Ashley TrĂ¼ter
> OTOH - studying css docs for one day I have to say that it is way more > complicated than View. Maybe just a question of becoming used to > different concept? What do others think? I think that by definition anything that has to describe a print target (eg. CSS, PDF, SGML, etc) will be more co