[REBOL] Re: read bug? probably not! - solved

2001-05-03 Thread Graham Chiu
On Thu, 03 May 2001 14:57:20 -0500 Brian Hawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, that may be an error in Apache. It should return a > 414 (Request-URI Too Long). I suppose it's possible that > the excessively long URL got mangled in transit, though. > > The HTTP standard warns against rely

[REBOL] Re: read bug? probably not!

2001-05-03 Thread Brian Hawley
Graham Chiu wrote: >I've done some more testing, and here's a test script >at http://www.compkarori.com/cgi-local/testcgi.r > >#!/path/to/rebol -cs >REBOL [ > Title: "testcgi.r" > File: %testcgi.r > Date: 3-May-2001 > Author: [ "Graham Chiu" ] > Email:

[REBOL] Re: read bug? probably not!

2001-05-03 Thread Graham Chiu
On Wed, 2 May 2001 14:14:46 -0700 Holger Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My experience is that using very long URLs causes > problems > with some web servers and web browsers (e.g. Netscape > 4.x, > IIRC). We recently switched one of our internal CGI-based > systems over from GET to POST beca