[REBOL] Re: reading back checksum/secure

2003-10-23 Thread rebOldes
Hello SunandaDH, Tuesday, October 21, 2003, 11:30:24 PM, you wrote: Sac> The other problem is that URLs pass through a host of intervening machines Sac> downstream of you and your server. So: Sac> http://www.myserver.com/mycgi.r?username=carlos&password=#{A8C40A306844B07D7B3 Sac> C733C3A9EF479A

[REBOL] Re: reading back checksum/secure

2003-10-22 Thread carlos.lorenz
Sunanda, Your words enlightened some obscure points of the matter to me Thanks Carlos Em Ter 21 Out 2003 19:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: > Carlos: > > Is it secure to pass a checksum/secure value on a URL > > I mean when GET method is used on CGI? > > Checksum/secure is proof against reverse

[REBOL] Re: reading back checksum/secure

2003-10-22 Thread carlos.lorenz
Thank you Ted Em Ter 21 Out 2003 19:56, Ted Serpa escreveu: > It would seem Carl's Cookbook entry "Strong Authentication Method" could > serve as a useful example in this instance. > > http://www.rebol.net/cookbook/recipes/0019.html > > Ted > > -- To unsubscribe from this list, just send an emai

[REBOL] Re: reading back checksum/secure

2003-10-21 Thread Ted Serpa
y, October 21, 2003 4:30 PM Subject: [REBOL] Re: reading back checksum/secure > > Carlos: > > > Is it secure to pass a checksum/secure value on a URL > > I mean when GET method is used on CGI? > > Checksum/secure is proof against reverse engineering (given > #{DE1876

[REBOL] Re: reading back checksum/secure

2003-10-21 Thread SunandaDH
Carlos: > Is it secure to pass a checksum/secure value on a URL > I mean when GET method is used on CGI? Checksum/secure is proof against reverse engineering (given #{DE187642E6C75F60D10F29E52CAB54CDF676870D} you'd have a hard job working it backwards to the original string). But it isn't

[REBOL] Re: reading back checksum/secure

2003-10-21 Thread Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch
day, October 21, 2003 3:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Re: reading back checksum/secure > > > > You can't. Checksumming (hashing) is a one-way operation > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE

[REBOL] Re: reading back checksum/secure

2003-10-21 Thread Carlos Lorenz
Andreas, Maarten Is it secure to pass a checksum/secure value on a URL I mean when GET method is used on CGI? Carlos Em Ter 21 Out 2003 17:10, Andreas Bolka escreveu: > Tuesday, October 21, 2003, 8:42:31 PM, Carlos wrote: > > Considering the following code, how can I get :pwd back in plain > >

[REBOL] Re: reading back checksum/secure

2003-10-21 Thread Carlos Lorenz
Joel, I got it. That's exactly what I was looking for. The impossibility of getting back what was passed to checksum makes it ideal for login routines Thanks Carlos Em Ter 21 Out 2003 17:11, Joel Neely escreveu: > Hi, Carlos, > > You can't. See below. > > Carlos Lorenz wrote: > > Considering th

[REBOL] Re: reading back checksum/secure

2003-10-21 Thread Joel Neely
Hi, Carlos, You can't. See below. Carlos Lorenz wrote: > > Considering the following code, how can I get > :pwd back in plain English? > >>>write %password.txt checksum/secure pwd >> > >>>pwd: read %password.txt >> > > == "ç'ÑFJá$6è§&Ú[/^QØ8^[&" > Check the help for CHECKSUM: >> ? che

[REBOL] Re: reading back checksum/secure

2003-10-21 Thread Maarten Koopmans
You can't. Checksumming (hashing) is a one-way operation > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Carlos Lorenz > Sent: dinsdag 21 oktober 2003 20:43 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] reading back checksum/secure > > > Hello list,

[REBOL] Re: reading back checksum/secure

2003-10-21 Thread Andreas Bolka
Tuesday, October 21, 2003, 8:42:31 PM, Carlos wrote: > Considering the following code, how can I get :pwd back in plain > English? >>> pwd: ask "Enter password: " > Enter password: mypass > == "mypass" >>> write %password.txt checksum/secure pwd >>> pwd: read %password.txt > == "ç'ÑFJá$6è§