Hi, again, Carl,
OBTW...
I gave the link to the end of the thread. If you'd like to see how
we got there, you can start with
http://www.escribe.com/internet/rebol/m2952.html
It's a great example of how the REBOL user community can jump in
and help refine something into a much better state
Hi, Carl,
PMJI...
Carl Read wrote:
>
> map ? Is that a REBOL/Command word? View says it knows nothing
> about it.
>
We had a long discussion about MAP and other higher-order functions
almost exactly a year ago. One other demonstration of MAP that I
had fun with (pardon the pun! ;-) is give
hi,
the one i use has a deep refinement:
===CODE===
REBOL [
Title: "Map Function"
Date: "24-November-1999"
Author: "Larry Palmiter"
Purpose: { Maps a function of one arg
onto a (nested) block of values.
}
]
map: func [
"Maps a function onto elements of a block"
:f "fun
> > map ? Is that a REBOL/Command word? View says it knows nothing about
it.
>
> Larry Palmiter, and I think Ladislav Mecir, have written map functions
which may be what Hwee Kwang was referring to.
And mine is at:
http://valley.150m.com/Rebol/Values/Map.r
Andrew Martin
ICQ: 26227169 h
Hi Carl,
<< map ? Is that a REBOL/Command word? View says it knows nothing about
it. >>
Larry Palmiter, and I think Ladislav Mecir, have written map functions which
may be what Hwee Kwang was referring to. Here is Larry's:
; Larry Palmiter
map: func [fn blk args /local result][
On 06-Oct-01, Lim Hwee Kwang wrote:
> i use it with map replacepl b to bring into another program with
> ":" as list concatenator
> this doesn't work with map.
map ? Is that a REBOL/Command word? View says it knows nothing about
it.
--
Carl Read
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please s
