Hi Julian,
thank you for taking time to discuss the things. Some opinions are well
informed:
>First, to be fair, some things I like about rebol:
>
> - very obvious influence from both lisp and forth, both of which are
> interesting, complementary languages. (this covers a lot of aspects
>
Hi Julian,
Thanks so much for chiming in here!
JS> - no open source compiler for the language...
R# is an open source effort that has been started in that regard.
JS> - a lot of things seem magic...
That's one of the things I like about it. :) I gravitate towards
"human friendly" of langua
Hi Tim.
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 12:14:31PM -0900, Tim Johnson wrote:
> >
> > and especially with respect to the "Note to others..."
> >
> That was a remark that demeaned the author more
> than anyone else. Perhaps he or she could come
> forward and make a case for why one should not
> use rebol
>
> and especially with respect to the "Note to others..."
>
That was a remark that demeaned the author more
than anyone else. Perhaps he or she could come
forward and make a case for why one should not
use rebol?
I make a living writing code and I've coded in over
a dozen languages. Rebol's th
