On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 04:59:50 -0400, Maxim Olivier-Adlhoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have fixed this issue in the version I just uploaded to rebol.org
Hi, :-)) Thanks a lot.
> version 0.9.4.1 also adds theese two small extensions:
Yes, those help too :-) Robert
--
To unsubscribe from thi
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 16:36:10 +0200, Gabriele Santilli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RMM> But save is a native! Does anybody know this problem?
>
> I guess you have a redefined SAVE. (Using SLIM? I think Max is
> redefining SAVE, LOAD etc.)
Hi, most likely, yes. But shouldn't I get the redifi
> This works WRT evaluation but give an other error I don't understand:
> ** rval needs a value
> ** Where: save
> ** Near: rval: do encloded-func
Gabriele is right, this is specific to slim...
what happens is that because encompass wants to return any return value that the
function its calling
> This works WRT evaluation but give an other error I don't understand:
> ** rval needs a value
> ** Where: save
> ** Near: rval: do encloded-func
Note: "encloded-func" seems to be spelled wrongly. Perhaps it should:
"included-func"?
--
Andrew J Martin
ICQ: 26227169
http://www.rebol.it/Valley/
Hi Robert,
On Saturday, April 3, 2004, 1:48:49 PM, you wrote:
RMM> But save is a native! Does anybody know this problem?
I guess you have a redefined SAVE. (Using SLIM? I think Max is
redefining SAVE, LOAD etc.)
Regards,
Gabriele.
--
Gabriele Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- REBOL Pro
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Holger Kruse
> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 7:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: save/all & decimal!
> Yes, it's a bug, thanks. Will be fixed in the n
hi Robert,
<< I want to use this for business-object-versioning... >>
What about using a tuple! or issue! value?
--Gregg
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the
subject, without the quotes.
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:06:42PM +0200, Robert M. Muench wrote:
> Hi, I'm having a problem when using save/all with decimal! values. Try the
> following with Link client:
>
> >> save/all %test.txt make decimal! 1.2
>
> Is this a known bug? Any workaround? Robert
Yes, it's a bug, thanks. Will
