[REBOL] Re: set-net crash with unusual account name

Hi, Bry, As you might have noticed in a separate thread, REBOL generally correctly parses correctly formed URL's but not all websites seem to conform to the standard. The net-utils parsing rules *sometimes* can be patched to allow the url to be parsed. I have tried the patch for this

[REBOL] Re: set crash

Hi Romano, you should send it to feedback. Cheers Ladislav Romano The code: do bind to-block foo: 2 'system ** Script Error: foo is not defined in this context ** Near: foo: 2 is OK, but: do bind to-block set 'foo 2 'system crash on View 1.2.1.3.1 Can someone confirm/explain this?

[REBOL] Re: set

Hi Ryan Here is a short answer, others may wish to expand. When issued in the global context, both methods give the same results. But within the block defining an object, they do not: ob: make object! [ f1: func [x][x * x] set 'f2 func [x][x + x]] probe ob make object! [ f1: func [x][x *

[REBOL] Re: set

Hi Ryan A few examples, and explanations. set sets a word to a value set 'myword "test" == "test" myword == "test" word-to-set: 'test-word == test-word set word-to-set 9 == 9 test-word == 9 set [w1 w2 w3] 4 == 4 w1 == 4 w2

[REBOL] Re: Set-words and refinements

function explicity Then mydate could utilise the same set-word syntax as the date datatype. Waddya reckon? Brett. - Original Message - From: "Andrew Martin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 9:50 PM Subject: [REBOL] Re: Set-words and refinement