THE AGE
Howard damned on four fronts

By MICHAEL GORDON
Friday 17 March 2000

The Howard Government stands condemned for its blatant expediency,
hypocrisy,
inconsistency and cant on the issue of mandatory sentencing.

Expediency, because it is prepared to use the weight of numbers in its
party room to
thwart the will of the majority in the people's house. For it is now
clear that a free
vote in the House of Representatives would see the laws of the Northern
Territory
struck down.

Hypocrisy, because it uses international obligations to lecture the
states on how to
behave on some issues, but not others. Witness supervised injecting
rooms.

Inconsistency, because it was willing to override the Northern Territory
on euthanasia,
when a more compelling case in terms of a fair and just society can be
mounted on
mandatory sentencing.

And cant, because it was prepared to make great play of the lack of
findings in this
week's United Nations report after lobbying hard to have them excised
from the
document.

Indeed, the manner in which the Government appears to have influenced
the UN
officials who were asked to investigate the mandatory sentencing laws of
WA and the
NT is a slur on the reputation of that body.

It suggests there is one standard for "model international citizens"
like Australia,
another for the rest.

Surely, if conventions like those on the Rights of the Child are to mean
anything,
requests for advice of possible breaches should be dealt with the utmost
integrity and
a degree of transparency.

Sadly, the tone for the probe was set before the UN Secretary-General,
Kofi Annan,
arrived in Darwin last month to thank Australia for its role in
restoring order in East
Timor.

Mr Howard suggested Australia's human rights record meant the country
was immune
from international scrutiny, declaring: "We are not told what to do by
anybody."

The unfortunate impression is that Australia's reward for upholding
human rights in
East Timor is that our own blemishes escape proper scrutiny.

Having declared himself against mandatory sentencing, Mr Howard has
judged that
this is not a leadership issue.

Apparently, it is more important to stand up for the territory's right
to pass a bad law.


--
*********************************
Make the Hunger Site your homepage!
http://www.thehungersite.com/index.html
*********************************


-------------------------------------------------------
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:    unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ 
http://www.mail-archive.com/recoznet2%40paradigm4.com.au/

Reply via email to