Karen wrote:
>My confused comments are a very personal opinion which I'm allowed to
have -
>just like the rest of you.
Of course you're allowed to 'have' whatever opinion you want, but if you
want to enter them into a discussion, then you are no longer just 'having'
them, you are sharing them.
- Original Message -
From: Karen Crook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, 3 August 2000 10:04 P.M.
Subject: RE: [recoznet2] Re: The Canberra Times: Burke calls on ATSIC chair
to stand down while ...
> It is your business when he is part of the p
ginal Message -
From: Karen Crook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, 3 August 2000 9:59 P.M.
Subject: RE: [recoznet2] Re: The Canberra Times: Burke calls on ATSIC chair
to stand down while ...
> TRUDY: There are also political considerations within ATSIC th
ty. AS
usual, Karen should read what was said and read her own confused comments
and try and sort out her thoughts before sharing them with everyone.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Laurie Forde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, August
out that it was a
witch hunt.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Trudy & Rod Bray
Sent: Thursday, 3 August 2000 11:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Re: The Canberra Times: Burke calls on ATSIC
chair to stand down while
t was said and read her own confused comments
> and try and sort out her thoughts before sharing them with everyone.
>
> Tim
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Laurie Forde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thursday, August 0
Hi Laurie,
Laurie wrote:
>Hi Tim,
>
>I don't accept the comparison between Clark and Howard and his gang.
I think that's fair enough and would be at pains to say the comparison is
rather one dimensional - that is, both refused to follow the procedural
expectation (not law, not even necessarily
stand down
> but that doesn't mean - even remotely - that I think he is guilty. AS
> usual, Karen should read what was said and read her own confused comments
> and try and sort out her thoughts before sharing them with everyone.
>
> Tim
>
>
>
> -----Original Messa
ed comments
and try and sort out her thoughts before sharing them with everyone.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Laurie Forde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, August 03, 2000 6:40 AM
Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Re: The Canberra Times: B
eing
referred to was the standing down - not rape.
Trudy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Trudy & Rod Bray
> Sent: Thursday, 3 August 2000 11:56 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Re:
ou're right about rape being in the past some day - I won't hold my
breath.
Trudy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Trudy & Rod Bray
> Sent: Thursday, 3 August 2000 11:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Laurie Forde
Sent: Thursday, 3 August 2000 3:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Re: The Canberra Times: Burke calls on ATSIC
chair to stand down while ...
The timing of the charge
EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sandy Sanders
Sent: Thursday, 3 August 2000 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [recoznet2] Re: The Canberra Times: Burke calls on ATSIC
chair to stand down while ...
Could everyone please just ignore Karen Crooke's last remarks?
We all know she is
riginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Trudy & Rod Bray
Sent: Thursday, 3 August 2000 1:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Re: The Canberra Times: Burke calls on ATSIC
chair to stand down while ...
Tim,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Re: The Canberra Times: Burke calls on ATSIC
chair to stand down while ...
Tim,
You might expect him to but he wouldn't, would he? There USED to be
procedural niceties here until the Howard mob got in and did away with
them. It is their disre
ne day it won't exist.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Trudy & Rod Bray
Sent: Thursday, 3 August 2000 11:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Re: The Canberra Times: Burke calls on ATSIC
chair to stand down while ...
both
parties, there can be no Reconciliation in AustraliaGeoff Clark.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 2:08 AM
Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Re: The Canberra Times: Burke calls on ATSIC chair
to stand down while
said originally, consistency says I should
expect Clarke to do the same.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Laurie Forde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, August 03, 2000 5:48 AM
Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Re: The Canberra Times: Burke calls
OTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 12:05 AM
Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Re: The Canberra Times: Burke calls on ATSIC chair
to stand down while ...
> Hi Trudy,
>
> you wrote:
>
> >I agree with you, Tim, that ALL in those kinds of situations should
> >stand down.
>
> Ok
Hi Trudy,
you wrote:
>I agree with you, Tim, that ALL in those kinds of situations should
>stand down.
Okay
Trudy:
It seems, however, that society has accepted - in general -
>what has become the standard behaviour of this government.
Including Geoff Clarke and those who support him staying.
to consider here - if John Howard were
> >> accused of rape, I'd sure as hell expect him to stand aside until the
> trial.
> >> Consistency compels me to think Clarke should too. Dontchareckon?
> >>
> >> Tim
> >> ==
> >>
the
trial.
>> Consistency compels me to think Clarke should too. Dontchareckon?
>>
>> Tim
>> ==
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Trudy & Rod Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Th
s me to think Clarke should too. Dontchareckon?
>
> Tim
> ==
> -Original Message-
> From: Trudy & Rod Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thursday, August 03, 2000 12:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Re: The Canberr
t2] Re: The Canberra Times: Burke calls on ATSIC chair
to stand down while ...
>Have you convicted him already? What happened to innocent until PROVEN
>guilty? Burke, Howard and Court have condemned themselves.
>
>Trudy
>
--
RecOz
TECTED]; news-clip
> Subject: [recoznet2] Re: The Canberra Times: Burke calls on ATSIC chair
> to stand down while ...
>
> Alan Jones the Readers Digest second most trusted man in Australia, bigotted
> racists such as Burke, Howard and Court among our elected leaders---we must
> be
Could everyone please just ignore Karen Crooke's last remarks?
We all know she is just being provocative, and we all understand
the principle of innocent until proven guilty, etc.
Whatever is going on with Geoff Clark (and I'm suspicious of the
timing ot the charges), we'll find out soon enou
Behalf Of Laurie Forde
Sent: Tuesday, 1 August 2000 1:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; news-clip
Subject: [recoznet2] Re: The Canberra Times: Burke calls on ATSIC chair
to stand down while ...
Alan Jones the Readers Digest second most trusted man in Australia, bigotted
racists such as Burke, Howard
Alan Jones the Readers Digest second most trusted man in Australia, bigotted
racists such as Burke, Howard and Court among our elected leaders---we must
be a pretty low lot.
Laurie
Laurie and Desley Forde
Email. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Without a treaty, which spells out the obligations and rights o
28 matches
Mail list logo
