Re: Xfree86 4.0

2000-03-16 Thread David D.W. Downey
Most likely not. Mandrake doesn't thoroughly test everything before releasing it. If it compiles that's all they care about. I know for a fact that Red Hat tests their RPMs before releasing them. If they come in for contrib, then you are usually on your own as to whether they work or not.

Re: Xfree86 4.0

2000-03-16 Thread Frederic Lepied
"David D.W. Downey" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Most likely not. Mandrake doesn't thoroughly test everything before releasing it. If it compiles that's all they care about. What makes you said that ? Every release of XFree86 that I have done has been tested. I know for a fact that Red Hat

Re: Xfree86 4.0

2000-03-16 Thread Vandoorselaere Yoann
"David D.W. Downey" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Most likely not. Mandrake doesn't thoroughly test everything before releasing it. If it compiles that's all they care about. First, we have 2 dedicated XFree developper doing our X package and one of them is working full time on X. They are

Re: Xfree86 4.0

2000-03-16 Thread David D.W. Downey
First, snip So, we do far more than compiling them. I will not address the first, since this will lend to a long and drawn out debate covering many different issues that are better served outside of a public forum. Second, we do not insult redhat on our list, please be polite and do so.

Re: Xfree86 4.0

2000-03-16 Thread Vandoorselaere Yoann
"David D.W. Downey" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Wooa, for a Microsoft certified person i think you say more than you know : It's just a cert. Just a cert. Do I work for microsoft? No. Therefore THIS comment is out of line as well. And you claim, *I'M* fighting the community. I

Re: Xfree86 4.0

2000-03-16 Thread Mark Komarinski
Arright. Take this "who whizzed in whose wheaties" somewhere else. Neither of you are making your respective companies look any better doing this, and I'm getting personally embarrased to say I'm a RH user. But the question still stands - what's the timeline for 4.0? I downloaded the

2 gig filesize limit

2000-03-16 Thread terry barnum
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask, so I apologize if it isn't. Running intel RH6.1 with 18 gigs of drive space striped as RAID 0. Is there a way to work with files larger than 2 gigs? I understand there is an issue with 32 bit architecture, but I believe there are other OSes doing

Re: 2 gig filesize limit

2000-03-16 Thread Alan Cox
I know that while evaluating Reiser FS for use on SourceForge we've created files up to 4gb in size. Some versions of reiserfs had a hack for this. Its not a good idea and Im told its now been removed. If you grab the LFS patches for 2.2 from the RH 6.2beta kernel rpms you'll be able to build

Re: 2 gig filesize limit

2000-03-16 Thread terry barnum
I know that while evaluating Reiser FS for use on SourceForge we've created files up to 4gb in size. Some versions of reiserfs had a hack for this. Its not a good idea and Im told its now been removed. If you grab the LFS patches for 2.2 from the RH 6.2beta kernel rpms you'll be able to build

Re: 2 gig filesize limit

2000-03-16 Thread Alan Cox
So are you saying that installing the LFS patches into RH6.1 running on an Intel P2 box will enable a new 64bit version of ext2 (ext3?) filesystem that can handle large files? Yes. The ext2 fs can already handle large files, its the infrastructure around it you need to get. The patches add

Re: 2 gig filesize limit

2000-03-16 Thread Alan Cox
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/redhat-6.2beta/i386/RedHat/ and couldn't find anything related to LFS. Thanks for your patience and sorry to ask so many questions but I haven't been able to find any info so I can figure it out for myself. They are in the kernel srpm but commented out by

Re: Xfree86 4.0

2000-03-16 Thread Chris Abbey
At 10:42 3/16/00 -0500, Mark Komarinski wrote: Arright. Take this "who whizzed in whose wheaties" somewhere else. Neither of you are making your respective companies look any better doing this, and I'm getting personally embarrased to say I'm a RH user. agreed. But the question still stands -

Re: Can't reopen pipe

2000-03-16 Thread Michael Ju. Tokarev
Hi! The same is here, but I never post it to list. 400mhz Celeron, ECC ram, modern HDD from IBM (but ide, not scsi). This is just with kernel, but very rarely, about 20 compiles and 1 failed. I just hit Enter on this... Or do "rpm -bb ... /dev/null". Probably not a right way, but I can't