R P Herrold wrote:
>
> After mirroring, in the second script, It looks as though all
> that needs be done is to change one line to read:
OK, mirroring works well, but how do we now update the two
cd's? Previously there was just the one and would use something like
the script below, but now, there
After mirroring, in the second script, It looks as though all
that needs be done is to change one line to read:
UPDDIR=/home/ftp/pub/redhat/updates/7.0/${ARCH}
This is untested, but should work. Try it on a backup. Let
us know, please.
-- Russ
On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> >
herrold wrote:
> package=Redhat70-ud
> site=download.sourceforge.net
> remote_dir=/pub/mirrors/redhat/redhat/updates/7.0
> remote_user=anonymous
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> exclude_patt=(^|/)(\.mirror$|sparc|alpha)
> compress_patt=
> comment="Redh
>
> Ok, but looking at the particular case that brought this up I don't
> think it, as an example, does put Linux growth in jeopardy. Saying
> "/bin/sh" is POSIX bourne shell only doesn't stop any advancements for
> those who prefer bash. They can put "#! /bin/bash" on their shell
> scripts to g
> Can happen. In fact there are youngsters who pick BSDs because those
> people who are a few years older are using Linux.
This quintegenarian subscribed to a few FreeBSD lists. It's astonishing the
about of mail on them.
___
Redhat-devel-list m
> It is a pain in the to teach them not to
podex
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
Matt Fahrner a écrit :
> JF Martinez wrote:
> > There is a thing you have to consider:and that is people coming to
> > Unix are not the only Linux usersa nd also there are more than one
> > hundred million people waiting to be "libearted" from Windows.
>
> Yes, I pray for them daily.
>
> > I fr
Hello,
had I not reading this list for quite a long time, I would
just say "Oh, another troll" :-)
> I frankly don't want to acept a thing as standard just
> because it is in Unix.
No. I want to accept it, because it is in Single Unix Specification.
You might think that the portability is nothi
JF Martinez wrote:
> There is a thing you have to consider:and that is people coming to
> Unix are not the only Linux usersa nd also there are more than one
> hundred million people waiting to be "libearted" from Windows.
Yes, I pray for them daily.
> I frankly don't want to acept a thing as
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Yes. But Xwrapper SHOULD NOT be used to launch 4.0.1 X server. Not because
> > XFree developers say so (they do), but because Xwrapper is the cause of
> > REAL troubles in XFree 4.0.1. It interferes with the way X server does
> > hardware probing. Th
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> IMHO, it would be a very good idea to have a 100% posix-compliant /bin/
>> sh without any extensions. /bin/sh should *not* be symlinked to /bin/
>> bash.
> Did you read the documentation?
> Here's another fragment:
>
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Matt Wilson wrote:
> Huh? The X server *is* running as root, Xwrapper runs it that way.
I know. But still there is a clear difference. Don't know where it comes
from. Xwrapper code should explain. Maybe it performs special tricks.
> Adding a setuid bit would do the same th
Matt Fahrner a écrit :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > In other words: when standard Linux programs are superior to the
> > Posix/Unix standard then to hell with POSIX and UNIX. It is now to
> > them to adopt _our_ standards.
>
> Nothing personal, but I think this is a bad attitude. Not only is i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> IMHO, it would be a very good idea to have a 100% posix-compliant /bin/
> sh without any extensions. /bin/sh should *not* be symlinked to /bin/
> bash.
Did you read the documentation?
Here's another fragment:
Major Differences From The SVR4.2 Bourne Shell
Huh? The X server *is* running as root, Xwrapper runs it that way.
Adding a setuid bit would do the same thing.
Matt
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 07:26:35PM +0300, Alex Kanavin wrote:
>
> Yes. But Xwrapper SHOULD NOT be used to launch 4.0.1 X server. Not because
> XFree developers say so (they do),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In other words: when standard Linux programs are superior to the
> Posix/Unix standard then to hell with POSIX and UNIX. It is now to
> them to adopt _our_ standards.
Nothing personal, but I think this is a bad attitude. Not only is it
exactly what we hate out of Micro
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Matt Wilson wrote:
> "which X server to use" is considered part of individual system
> configuration. Xwrapper executes /etc/X11/X, and is pamified such
> that remote users can't start X servers.
Yes. But Xwrapper SHOULD NOT be used to launch 4.0.1 X server. Not because
XFre
"which X server to use" is considered part of individual system
configuration. Xwrapper executes /etc/X11/X, and is pamified such
that remote users can't start X servers.
Matt
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 02:14:25PM +0300, Alex Kanavin wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Kevin Brosius wrote:
>
> > Oh, Xwr
Hi!
I want to do a new install class in anaconda that skip lilo, partition,
network, package-selection and format. I make a new installClass, and
add to the skipList lilo, partition, network and package-selection. I
only have problem when add partition to the skipList:
Traceback (innermo
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Svante Signell wrote:
> The following problem with wget has been annoying me for a long time:
hmmm ... I use mirror, and have for years -- Never had that issue. I
too tried wget, and concluded it was not worth me learning well
enough to use generally for mirroring.
... He
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Kevin Brosius wrote:
> Oh, Xwrapper is not expected to be used with 4.0.x servers. It isn't
> part of 4.0.x installs.
Hmm, then I should probably submit this to Red Hat's bugzilla. They do
include Xwrapper into their 4.0.1 install, symlink /usr/bin/X11R6/X to
it, and ship /u
Hi,
The following problem with wget has been annoying me for a long time:
When the files (eg .../rawhide/SRPMS/SRPMS) on the mirror site
change date but remains the same, updating with
wget -c -r ftp://.../SRPMS/SRPMS
to get the updated files ALL already dowloaded files with the same
revision b
22 matches
Mail list logo
