Chris Kloiber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > Could it be related to this bug?
> >
> > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17830
>
> Same card, yes. But kudzu lives in the bootnet.img floppy?
The pcitable that lists the mappings from PCI ids to drivers
does, and it comes from kud
Chris Kloiber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > BTW- I have a tulip network card (LinkSys LNE100TX version 2.0 - the
> > > good one) that is not only not detected by the RawHide bootnet.img, but
> > > there is no choice for a tulip module on either the boot.img nor
> > > drivers.img (there is an ol
Dax Kelson wrote:
>
> Chris Kloiber said once upon a time (Tue, 19 Dec 2000):
>
> > BTW- I have a tulip network card (LinkSys LNE100TX version 2.0 - the
> > good one) that is not only not detected by the RawHide bootnet.img, but
> > there is no choice for a tulip module on either the boot.img no
Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> Chris Kloiber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > Is the current incarnation of RawHide one of the "not going to install"
> > kind?
>
> Very possibly. The Rawhide installer definitely falls into the
> 'not even given a *hint* of QA' category.
Ok. I can live with that.
> >
Thomas Dodd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> why -g and -O2 ?
> optomized with debug info doesn't make much sense.
Actually, -g -O certainly does (as gcc will have data flow info to
catch uninitialized variables). -g -O2 just seems to be a default
with some configure scripts.
--
Alan Shutko <[EM
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Mario Torre wrote:
> But that's not important if it works for at least the good code... there is a
> flag to avoid strict ISO compliance with the C++ compiler?
You can try "-fpermissive", but 2.96 with -fpermissive is still stricter
than older versions without it.
> t1.c:25
Mario Torre wrote:
>
> gcc -o t1 -g -Wall -O2 t1.c
> t1.c: In function `main':
> t1.c:25: warning: implicit declaration of function `strlen'
> t1.c:27: warning: implicit declaration of function `strcpy'
why -g and -O2 ?
optomized with debug info doesn't make much sense.
> There is not the incl
On Wednesday 20 December 2000 22:25, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> 2.96-69?
Hi, Bernard,
Yes, that's the release...
> There are no known bugs in 2.96-69, so chances are the programs are
> broken. 2.96-69 is still (and will always be) much stricter about ISO
> compliance than older (broken)
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Mario Torre wrote:
> Well, I have upgraded the snapshot version of the gcc-2.96 to that released
> with the errata.
2.96-69?
> Well... the compiler breaks in the same point of the compilation of many
> programs!
There are no known bugs in 2.96-69, so chances are the progra
Can someone help me... I need to know how to
compile a g++ program on RedHat 6.2. I installed libg++-2.8.1-2.i386, is
that enough? What command do I execute to compile the
program?
Please help
Paul
Hi, everybody!
Well, I have upgraded the snapshot version of the gcc-2.96 to that released
with the errata.
I had trouble in the download, so I have chosen to download only the source
package.
This morning I have build the binary packages using the spec file (rpm -bb
gcc.spec).
Well... the
Chris Kloiber said once upon a time (Tue, 19 Dec 2000):
> BTW- I have a tulip network card (LinkSys LNE100TX version 2.0 - the
> good one) that is not only not detected by the RawHide bootnet.img, but
> there is no choice for a tulip module on either the boot.img nor
> drivers.img (there is an ol
Chris Kloiber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Is the current incarnation of RawHide one of the "not going to install"
> kind?
Very possibly. The Rawhide installer definitely falls into the
'not even given a *hint* of QA' category.
> I am unable to trick it into a had drive install (can't find CD im
There are several sites that might qualify. Here's one.
http://www.scyld.com/
Tony, take care to read the installation guide;-)
--
Cheers
John Summerfield
http://www2.ami.com.au/ for OS/2 & linux information.
Configuration, networking, combined IBM ftpsites index.
Note: mail deliveed to me i
Is the current incarnation of RawHide one of the "not going to install"
kind?
I am unable to trick it into a had drive install (can't find CD image)
and I am also unable to get it to do an FTP install (finds CD image, but
Sig 11's on loading anaconda) I know what Sig-11 is, and I know it's not
RA
15 matches
Mail list logo
