Re: linuxconf

2001-01-19 Thread Victor Shnayder
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Chris Garrigues wrote: > > From: Victor Shnayder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:51:12 -0500 > > > > >From ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/redhat-6.2/i386/RedHat/base/comps: > > > > This is the list of stuff that redhat 6.2 installs in all cases (there > >

Re: linuxconf

2001-01-19 Thread Chris Garrigues
> From: Victor Shnayder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:51:12 -0500 > > >From ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/redhat-6.2/i386/RedHat/base/comps: > > This is the list of stuff that redhat 6.2 installs in all cases (there > is not way to deselect these packages during the install)

Re: linuxconf

2001-01-19 Thread Victor Shnayder
Christopher McCrory wrote: > > Hello... > > Jeff Lane wrote: > > > On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Chris Garrigues wrote: > > > >> It can be removed from base w/o problem. I've done so. There are some other > >> things that would be nice to be able to remove (like mouseconfig), but which > >> break the

Re: Non US keytable for fsck (was Re: reiserFS in RH7.1?)

2001-01-19 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Martin Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You want a work-around for the keytables? Not really - more a "if it's a bug or feature enhancement, put it in bugzilla or it doesn't really exist" statement (BTW: The above has been fixed) -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc. __

Re: Non US keytable for fsck (was Re: reiserFS in RH7.1?)

2001-01-19 Thread Pekka Savola
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Martin Bartlett wrote: > > You want a work-around for the keytables? Just copy /usr/lib/kbd to > /lib/kbd, unmount /usr then create /usr/lib and link/copy /lib/kbd to > it. When you boot, the /usr directory on the root partition will only > contain lib/kbd et al - not too muc

Non US keytable for fsck (was Re: reiserFS in RH7.1?)

2001-01-19 Thread Martin Bartlett
You want a work-around for the keytables? Just copy /usr/lib/kbd to /lib/kbd, unmount /usr then create /usr/lib and link/copy /lib/kbd to it. When you boot, the /usr directory on the root partition will only contain lib/kbd et al - not too much space taken but enough to get loadkeys working; whe

Re: Display manager background logo

2001-01-19 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JLT> What generates the RedHat logo and blue gradient that appears behind JLT> the display manager (kdm) login box? Figures, after being stuck for three days, I figure it out ten minutes after posting. KDM uses some of the XDM configur

Display manager background logo

2001-01-19 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
What generates the RedHat logo and blue gradient that appears behind the display manager (kdm) login box? I have a problem with some machines having it and some not. My machines are running RedHat 7 upgraded to kde2 using the RPMS from linux-easy.com as suggested by Bero in a Bugzilla report. I

Re: linuxconf

2001-01-19 Thread Karen Shaeffer
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 10:07:00AM -0500, Jeff Lane wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Evandro Fernandes Giovanini wrote: > > > > > > Yes. And even if it is installed, it is easy to uninstall it using 'rpm > > > linuxconf'. > > > > > > > > i install a base installation from ftp/http and linuxconf is no

Re: anaconda 7.1 + released 2.4.0 = trouble?

2001-01-19 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Eric Sandeen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Pretty sure it's not a problem with the process being forked - we > commented out "probe" and it failed on the next process it tried to > fork. > > Test python scripts worked fine when the system was booted normally with > this kernel (i.e. off the hard

anaconda 7.1 + released 2.4.0 = trouble?

2001-01-19 Thread Eric Sandeen
Just wondering if anyone had tried building anaconda boot images with the released 2.4.0 kernel? We were working with a modified installer, and things went well with 2.4.0-test11 as the BOOT/install kernel, but 2.4.0-released caused us some trouble. As soon as anaconda tried to os.fork() off a p

Re: linuxconf

2001-01-19 Thread Chris Garrigues
> From: Christopher McCrory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 11:22:04 -0800 > > Hello... > > > Jeff Lane wrote: > > > On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Chris Garrigues wrote: > > > >> It can be removed from base w/o problem. I've done so. There are some > other > >> things that would be n

enabling xidle extension

2001-01-19 Thread apark
Just wondering whether someone here would know how to enable xidle extension in XFree86 version 3.3.6. I added the following to the /etc/X11/XF86Config file Section "Files" ... ModulePath "/local/lib/X11" ... EndSection Section "Module" Load "XIdle.so" EndSection but it seems that Modu

Re: linuxconf

2001-01-19 Thread Christopher McCrory
Hello... Jeff Lane wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Chris Garrigues wrote: > >> It can be removed from base w/o problem. I've done so. There are some other >> things that would be nice to be able to remove (like mouseconfig), but which >> break the installer if they're taken out. Thi

Re: linuxconf

2001-01-19 Thread Dax Kelson
Jeff Lane said once upon a time (Fri, 19 Jan 2001): > That is true, but we were trying to ascertain if Linuxconf is removable > from the install WHILE installing, ie doing a custom install, adn > deselecting it for install. > > (personally, I dont think it should be installed at all anyway, but t

Re: linuxconf

2001-01-19 Thread Jeff Lane
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Chris Garrigues wrote: > It can be removed from base w/o problem. I've done so. There are some other > things that would be nice to be able to remove (like mouseconfig), but which > break the installer if they're taken out. That is true, but we were trying to ascertain if

Re: linuxconf

2001-01-19 Thread Chris Garrigues
> From: Jeff Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:56:32 -0500 (EST) > > On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Christopher McCrory wrote: > > > Hello... > > Are you sure about that? IIRC anything in the 'base' portion of comps > is > > non optional. IIRC there is a gnome-linuxconf GUI for

Re: linuxconf

2001-01-19 Thread Jeff Lane
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Christopher McCrory wrote: > Hello... > Are you sure about that? IIRC anything in the 'base' portion of comps is > non optional. IIRC there is a gnome-linuxconf GUI for linuxconf that is > un-checkable, but the core package is still installed. Ummm... you may be r

Re: linuxconf

2001-01-19 Thread Christopher McCrory
Hello... Jeff Lane wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Evandro Fernandes Giovanini wrote: > >>> Yes. And even if it is installed, it is easy to uninstall it using 'rpm >>> linuxconf'. >>> >>> >> >> i install a base installation from ftp/http and linuxconf is not >> unselectable; i wish it was. >

Re: linuxconf

2001-01-19 Thread Jeff Lane
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Evandro Fernandes Giovanini wrote: > > > > Yes. And even if it is installed, it is easy to uninstall it using 'rpm > > linuxconf'. > > > > > i install a base installation from ftp/http and linuxconf is not > unselectable; i wish it was. It is... try doing a custom install.

Re: linuxconf

2001-01-19 Thread Evandro Fernandes Giovanini
Em Sexta 19 Janeiro 2001 01:55, you wrote: > > > > could linuxconf be removed from the base installation? > > > > Yes. And even if it is installed, it is easy to uninstall it using 'rpm > linuxconf'. > > i install a base installation from ftp/http and linuxconf is not unselectable; i wish it wa

kernel 2.4 + ppp + nfs (modules alias)

2001-01-19 Thread Levente Farkas
hi, on my rh 7.0 with latest rawhide kernel, I've got two problems. on startup the kernel can't find ppp modul, of cource since there is no ppp modul in 2.4, but there is a group of ppp modules so it'd be useful if ppp install some new line into modules.conf. anyway I attached the debian default