Michael Tokarev wrote:
...
> if (__fpending (stdout) == 0)
[]
> size_t
> __fpending (FILE *fp)
> {
> if (fp->_mode > 0)
> return fp->_wide_data->_IO_write_ptr - fp->_wide_data->_IO_write_base;
> else
> return fp->_IO_write_ptr - fp->_IO_write_base;
> }
I was able to debug it with g
Michael Tokarev wrote:
>
> John Summerfield wrote:
> >
> > > I noticied recently that starting from some recent glibc
> > > version, all {file,text,shell}utils (aka fetish) started
> > > to crash at exit, in __fpending() routine. After some
> >
> > Specifically, what version(s) of glibc give you
John Summerfield wrote:
>
> > I noticied recently that starting from some recent glibc
> > version, all {file,text,shell}utils (aka fetish) started
> > to crash at exit, in __fpending() routine. After some
>
> Specifically, what version(s) of glibc give you problems?
All >= 2.2.4-18 gives this
> I noticied recently that starting from some recent glibc
> version, all {file,text,shell}utils (aka fetish) started
> to crash at exit, in __fpending() routine. After some
Specifically, what version(s) of glibc give you problems?
--
Cheers
John Summerfield
Microsoft's most solid OS: http:
I noticied recently that starting from some recent glibc
version, all {file,text,shell}utils (aka fetish) started
to crash at exit, in __fpending() routine. After some
attempts to discover the problem, I found that any package
compiled with old version of glibc runs just fine. I have
fileutils-4
I think I know what I did wrong... This is the first time I hacked in
python.. didn't realize how picky the whitespace is! WOW! My error was
an unrecognised token.
-Original Message-
From: peck, william
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 3:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: patch
Hello!
I am trying to modify annaconda to allow me to install the MBR on the
drive that has the /boot partition on it. This is important because the
first drive in a fibre channel environment might be shared.
Well I was hoping you could look at this code and tell me whats wrong?
It works when
I have made some more experiments with less;
I am attaching two patches;
less346_bufsize32k.diff one is like the previous one, except
that buffer size is 32k, which seems to be enough, and is power of 2, so
division, multiplication and remainder may be computed more efficiently
(the compiler migh
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Thomas Dodd wrote:
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 16:48:58 -0600
> From: Thomas Dodd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: making less faster on large amounts of stdin data
Sorry for late response; I did not check redhat-devel list
hi,
it'd be useful to add eclipse to the distro. it seems to me as one of the
best candidate for IDE on linux (except KDeveloper:-), since it's real
multiplatform and well designed (may be we have to wait for the C/C++
plug-in).
www.eclipse.org
--
Levente "Si vis
10 matches
Mail list logo
