Try building ur module on the current version of kernel!
-Original Message-
From: sudhir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 8:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Kernel version mismatch
Hi all
I am new to linux and using
redhat 7.3
when i try to install a modul
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 15:08, Jean Francois Martinez wrote:
>
> Also since not all back ends are of equal quality at times "optimizing"
> for the processor brings a slowdown: the K6 will run faster on code who
> is compiled with -mcpu=i686 than with -march=k6 and that is valid both
> for gcc 2.96
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 22:01, Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
>
> Jean Francois Martinez wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 18:25, Florin Andrei wrote:
> >
> >>What is the reason why there are kernel RPMs optimised for Athlon, but
> >>no glibc RPMs for Athlon?
> >
> >
> > Perhaps there isn't much to be gai
Jean Francois Martinez wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 18:25, Florin Andrei wrote:
>
>>What is the reason why there are kernel RPMs optimised for Athlon, but
>>no glibc RPMs for Athlon?
>
>
> Perhaps there isn't much to be gained. AMD knows far too well that
> because it is the "minor company
On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 18:25, Florin Andrei wrote:
> What is the reason why there are kernel RPMs optimised for Athlon, but
> no glibc RPMs for Athlon?
Perhaps there isn't much to be gained. AMD knows far too well that
because it is the "minor company" most of the time its processors will
be runn
What is the reason why there are kernel RPMs optimised for Athlon, but
no glibc RPMs for Athlon?
Which is the reccomended glibc package to install on an Athlon system?
The i386 or the i686?
--
Florin Andrei
If you wear a tinfoil hat nowadays, people will just think
you're advertising for some M
