Frank Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is not runtime, it is compile time.
> (even if it is runtime, how can uname() tell if you are running
> a kernel provided by redhat or downloaded from kernel.org?).
>
> Anyway, the program calls function
> kill_fasync()
> under Redhat's kernel, it re
Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Freivald, Joseph A, GOVMK wrote:
>
> > I thought one of the other things about Mandrake is they included
> > non-exportable encryption, which is not an option for RedHat. No?
>
> No, since they're based in France, they'r
Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > any hints what to do in the code so that it can compile under both
> > kernels?
> try play with /boot/kernel.h
Sorry i must explain what i wanna say, try to play with version.h who
play with /boot/kernel.h
For example see t
Frank Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> /boot/kernel.h is generated by /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit at
> the boot time if it isn't already there (or CPU changed):
> check that file for the detailed logic on when/how to
> generate this file.
>
> So /boot/kernel.h may show you have a redhat system, but
>
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > [summer@emu summer]$ cat /boot/kernel.h
> > > cat: /boot/kernel.h: No such file or directory
[...]
> [summer@possum summer]$ ls -l /boot/kernel.h
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root 237 Dec 6 1999 /boot/kernel.h
so what the problem ? on the emu m
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [summer@emu summer]$ cat /boot/kernel.h
> cat: /boot/kernel.h: No such file or directory
> [summer@emu summer]$
> It's part of kernel-headers. If you've downloades source from ftp.kernel.org
> or a mirror, the file /boot/kernel.h may not exist, and
Frank Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is not runtime, it is compile time.
> (even if it is runtime, how can uname() tell if you are running
> a kernel provided by redhat or downloaded from kernel.org?).
>
> Anyway, the program calls function
> kill_fasync()
> under Redhat's kernel, it re
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Prasanth A. Kumar) writes:
> basing themselves on RPMS! Also, Mandrake is using it in their
> upcoming release.
noip we just shipping it as ''alternative'' but we still use
LinuxConf in our distribution.
--
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
Pittsbur
JF Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mandrake's marketing claims strongly performance improvements due to
> being compiled with PGCC (an unofficial GCC optimized for Pentiuls and
Mandrake's developpers claims using gcc2.95 and say it's make a big
difference.
--
MandrakeSoft Inc
Mark Komarinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any ideas? Or just bite the bullet, get a 2.3.x kernel, and try it that way?
--- ./drivers/usb/evdev.c.chmou Wed Mar 8 16:26:21 2000
+++ ./drivers/usb/evdev.c Wed Mar 8 16:36:47 2000
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
list->head = (list->head
"Michael Ju. Tokarev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It controlled by "%define lfs 0" in .spec. Can I say, for example,
> "rpm --rebuild kernel-...src.rpm lfn=1" ?
rpm --rebuild --define 'lfs 1' k*src.rpm
--
MandrakeSoft Inchttp://www.mandrakesoft.com
Pasadena, CA USA
11 matches
Mail list logo
