On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> Will newer Red Hat releases / kernel versions get better performance
> and plug/unplug behaviour? Any other user experience with this drive?
usb2 in the kernel is very new and performance is not the best. i get
about 50% more performance from firewire
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Rishabh Kumar Goel wrote:
> I have a Bencent 3.5" FireWire HDD. I also have a TI's TSB43ab22 iOHCI PCI
> card with a PCI-PCI bridge interface.
You have to set the drive for cable select, not master or slave.
-Dan
--
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
_
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Todd Lee wrote:
> I can't figure out how come most *nix'es don't support ACL's by default?
> I think it's pretty necessary to have ACL support in file servers.
Current linux NFS doesnt support ACL does it?
-Dan
--
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
__
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Craig Kelley wrote:
> I know you're all probably aware of this by now, but a serious hole is in
> all versions of OpenSSH shipped with all versions of RedHat:
> http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/278818/2002-06-23/2002-06-29/0
does any redhat ship with 'ChallengeRes
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, James Olin Oden wrote:
> The only issue with that is how well it scales. Also, I quickly did
> look at it and it looks like you have to provide a file per environment
> (i.e. representing the HD). I bet you could have that file live on a NFS
> mount, but again I wonder how i
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Jean Francois Martinez wrote:
> So what is so special about ReiserFS?
I have had bad repeatable data corruptions with XFS across numerous
production systems with various kernel versions and various XFS releases.
So I have had to stop using it :-(
Never had any data corrupti
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> I found this little article in my mail and
> would like to hear any thoughts?
> http://debian-br.sourceforge.net/txt/debian_vs_redhat.html
"unconvincing"
-Dan
--
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
__
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Bill Crawford wrote:
> It would depend on the application ... ext3 is actually better for
> some applications (according to a quick web search a while back, a
> "real world" benchmark with some databases showed ext3 a winner).
> ReiserFS on the other hand was optimized for Sq
On 18 Apr 2002, Florin Andrei wrote:
> 3. XFS
> This is interesting, because the XFS code base is actually very mature
> and stable. That's why, i guess, the Linux port became stable so
> quickly: because only the Linux "hooks" had to be made stable, while the
> core was already mature.
xfs is st
On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
> OpenSSH 3.1 also requires OpenSSL 0.9.6 or newer to build, which we
> haven't backported to 6.2. I'm sure this isn't going to be pretty.
openssl 0.9.6a compiles out of the box for 6.2 without a single problem.
ive been running openssh3.0 and openssl
On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Alex Kanavin wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Jean Francois Martinez wrote:
> > > Or just use avifile. I'm not familiar with it though, but I hope the
> > > developers are not as arrogant.
> > Thanks for the suggestion. I will not touch mplayer with a pole.
> Well, having said a
11 matches
Mail list logo
