--- Larry Greenleaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Some of you seem to forget that you were new to
> Linux once. Maybe the people who posted here did
> "RTFM" and did not understand it. Lets be real, some
> of these man pages are cryptic at best.
Yes, you are right. I was new to linux at one poi
--- wo shi ni baba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you did all I said, good for you, GOOD GOOD,
> should I give you some cookies?
> peace out
No, but you could have at least had the common
courtesy to at least acknowledge what I told you.
=
Kevin C. McConnell --RHCE--
_
--- wo shi ni baba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's what I think how questions should be handled:
>
> 1.In the case the question is posted to the wrong
> forum, politely direct the inquirer to the correct
> forum.
I did that.
> 2.In the case the question lacks a title, politely
> tells the
--- Larry Greenleaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have seen this post in several other locations.
> There are a lot of people, including myself, that
> can't seem to get make modules to complete
> successfully.
Which kernel version might you be referring to?
=
Kevin C. McConnell --RHCE--
--- John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Many experienced people would not have even read
> your question, because
> you neglected to use the Subject: field to tell us
> what you're writing
> about.
I will say, that is why I didn't read this thread. The
only reason I read it now, was because I *KNEW
--- John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I understand it, he's trying to control which NIC
> is used to install.
> Reoving support for other NICs does not affect
> what's used later.
>
> Then, he can fiddle with /etc/modules.conf if
> necessary.
>
> I personally would simply plug the cable into
--- John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Removing the modules for the NICs you don't want to
> use will force the
> issue;-)
I thought he was trying to designate which card he
wants to be eth0, eth1, etc... so that he can plug
each device into multiple networks/and or designate
which device should r
--- Lars Damerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From Kevin McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wed, Jan
> 29, 2003 at 11:13:23AM -0800:
> >
> > This is just something to get your mind working. I
> > know there is a way to pass options to modules as
> > t
--- Lars Damerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way I can make the device naming more
> clear?
This is just something to get your mind working. I
know there is a way to pass options to modules as
they're loaded. Using the IRQ and base address,
couldn't one conceivably assign eth0 to b
--- Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Corrupted kernel tarball then?
> Download/unpack/compile again?
Did you also verify the source using the PGP key? How
about making the required links to the linux-2.4.20
dir? ln -s /usr/src/linux-2.4.20 linux
ln -s /usr/src/linux-2.4.20 linux-2.4
--- John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which only checks the path.
>
> See the difference:
>
> [summer@skink incoming]$ which ifconfig
> /usr/bin/which: no ifconfig in
>
(/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/bin/:/usr/local/sbin/:/usr/sbin/:/home/summer/bin:/usr/lo
--- Jitesh Verma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not see manpage also. 'whereis'
> command also
> does not show ethtool.
Though this isn't really the appropriate list for this
question, I will still answer with a realistic answer.
You should use the which command instead. It's on many
more sy
--- Lars Nordin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course the best protection is to turn off and may
> be uninstall servers
> (services) that you won't be using.
And for an extra, extra layer of protection, if you
have the resources available, you should make each
device on your network and "appli
--- Jure Pecar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there any ETA of the next release of RedHat? I
> know that 'when it's
> ready' is the best answer...
If you knew that was the best answer you were going to
get, then why ask?
=
Kevin C. McConnell --RHCE--
___
--- Dan Hollis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i haven't played with jfs at all, afaik it is the
> most recent of the
> bunch. it has interesting features but it seems both
> xfs and reiser are
> considerably more advanced and tested.
Actually, JFS is the oldest of them all. JFS was the
original
--- Bill Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Well, I've not noticed anything ... but I havn't
> upgraded everything
> yet. Do you actually need to use nss_db?
No, I don't need it, but checking my
/etc/nsswitch.conf shows that I'm not using it first
either. That's the strange part. I always
--- Bill Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Um, which packages? I havn't noticed anything here
> but I'm only up
> to about Thursday with Raw Hide ... I'll happily try
> a few things or
> do a before/after test around upgrading whatever is
> causing trouble.
I'm getting problems with nss_db
Can anyone else verify that packages are now being
built with references against an undefined symbol
named __set_errno in the nss_db package from the
current rawhide?
=
Kevin C. McConnell --RHCE--
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online
Uncle George, Mozilla is looking for you. Please visit
this URL:
http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/missing.html
:o) Hope this is you
=
Kevin C. McConnell --RHCE--
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards®
http://mo
--- Riku Meskanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope, you guessed wrong, I haven't been living
> in complete darkness either :)
I know you aren't living in darkness, otherwise you
would be using some __OTHER__ O$. ;o)
> I've had VMware since Jun 21 1999 and gone trough
> all
> releases up to 3.
--- Jeremy Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the same time, it's extremely easy for me to lose
> an email about
> something in the pile of emails I get every day.
Bugzilla is much better for documenting issues because
every step of the process is put into writing and then
filed into the DB.
--- John Ellson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For example, it surprises me that some rpm
> dependency errors seem
> to not get fixed quickly. Would you like us to
> report them?
I think they would rather have us fix them than report
them.
=
Kevin C. McConnell --RHCE--
__
--- Riku Meskanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Those of you who haven't had opportunity to
> experience HP-UX
> features of host cloning,
I guess you've never heard of VMware which
supports host cloning under linux in a few seconds.
=
Kevin C. McConnell --RHCE--
___
--- Trond Eivind Glomsrød <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> We only have rsync for official mirror, AFAIK.
As Trond points out... official mirrors use it.
Doesn't that say enough? There are places that mirror
off of redhat that do offer anonymous rsync
--- "Ivan F. Martinez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ftpcopy is good to mirroring redhat files, because
> they change the dates without changing the files, I
> can specify to
> ignore date changes. Also the new version have a
> security key for limiting the number of deletes each
> time I run. In
--- Adam Dingle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I discovered Red Hat's Rawhide FTP directory
> (ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/) not
> long ago, and I've
> successfully grabbed a few packages from it and
> installed them on top of my
> Red Hat 7.2 installation. OK, so now I've decide
--- Panu Matilainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, it's a 2.4 kernel thing but patches to 2.2
> kernel exist too, and
> then you need glibc support also. RH7.0 had AFAIR
> LFS-support in the
> -enterprise kernel but that won't help you with
> RH6.1 at all where you'd
> need to recompile glibc
--- terry barnum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What prompted my hypothetical system question is I'm
> in the process
> of specing out a new file server and I thought maybe
> someone here
> would know if the setup would overcome the 2 gig
> limit I'm
> experiencing with our current server.
The
--- terry barnum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a question I hope someone here might be able
> to answer.
> Will this machine be able to serve files larger than
> 2 gigs via Samba?
out of curiousity, where are you getting the 2 gig
barrier from? There shouldn't be any problem with
this. If
--- "Lee, Myoung Ho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I'm using redhat-7.2 to make customized redhat cd.
>
> when I run /usr/lib/anaconda-runtime/buildinstall,
> some errors are
> occurred.
>
> .
> mke2fs 1.23, 15-Aug-2001.
> Wrote /tmp/makebootdisk.tree.11940 ( 604k
> com
--- Trond Eivind Glomsrød <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Erik Paulson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm curious how RedHat manages it's releases,
> especially while balancing the
> > needs of RedHat users against the fact that most
> of the code in your product
> > comes from somewhere else. F
--- Erik Paulson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
> I'm curious how RedHat manages it's releases,
> especially while balancing the
> needs of RedHat users against the fact that most of
> the code in your product
> comes from somewhere else. For the next release of
> RedHat, does the CEO wake
> up o
--- Jose Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PS: This is the second email I send to this list.
> From the first one I've received an automated reply
> saying that it was required approval from the list
> moderator, but it was never posted and I didn't
> received further reply. If the list is no
--- Michael Tokarev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is about C++ only. C language programs ARE
> compatible. Note that
> in e.g. 7.x, there is libstdc++-compat libraries, I
> expect to find the
> same on 8.x, so your C++ programs compiled on 7.x
> will run just fine on
> 8.x -- like 6.x vs 7
--- Jean Francois Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Alex Kanavin wrote:
> Reiserutils was in 7.2 and I think in 7.1. 7.2
> kernel has reiserfs
> support and I think 7.1was compiled with ReiserFS
> support too. So you
> can create and mount ReiserFS partitions if you
> want.
I have us
--- Hetz Ben Hamo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Amir,
>
> I recommend to you to buy this book and learn from
> it - lots of people told
> me it's a good book to learn:
>
> http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/linuxdrive2/
Some other good ones are:
Understanding the Linux Kernel (also by oreilly)
Is this the appropriate list where rawhide developers
mediate, and if not, where would that be? If one were
developing something in hopes to get it into the RH
distro, where would they be asking questions and
talking to other developers if the/this rawhide list
isn't the proper place?
TIA
=
K
37 matches
Mail list logo
