On Sat, 2002-12-28 at 15:22, Rodger Donaldson wrote:
> Starting with 8, and apprently to continue with 8.1, postgresql
> appears to be lacking large chunks of hitherto present functionality,
> such as the pgaccess client. Are there any plans to restore this, or
> are we supposed to rush off and bu
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 17:02, Carlos wrote:
> Why did you use dietlibc? Why did you not use glibc ?
dietlibc, as the name suggests, is a lightweight libc. It generates
noticibly smaller static executables that those linked against glibc.
This is important for anaconda as space is at a premium on
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 13:13, Todd Lee wrote:
> Thanks for the info! I guess I'll keep searching! When you did try to
> implement ACL support with the RedHat kernel, what patch did you use, and
> when you got it working which one did you use? Thanks in advance!
The EA/ACL patches are actually in
On Sat, 2002-08-31 at 21:27, Al Potter wrote:
> > John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Friday 30 August 2002 00:41, Chip Turner wrote:
> > > > To rpm, 1.61 and 1.061 are the same. But 1.6.1 and 1.0.6.1 are
> > > > different.
> > >
> > > Try reporting that as a bug and see what the resp
On Sun, 2002-08-25 at 20:09, Ryan Stotts wrote:
> I would like for the nForce drivers, and the latest Detonators to be included
> in the RH ISO so that I (and others) don't have to manually update the
> drivers right after install. This will enable OpenGL apps to work
> right after the OS is inst
On Sat, 2002-06-01 at 20:03, Dominik Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hello, list.
> Is there any possibility of seeing gcc3-3.1 packages in 7.3?
> 7.2 had gcc3, why 7.3 doesn't? For now, 7.3 users are stuck
> with gcc3-3.0.4 from 7.2 updates...
> Or am I dreaming too much and all this is not worth filing
>
On Mon, 2002-05-06 at 14:42, Florin Andrei wrote:
> But wouldn't you love it if Red Hat would provide somewhere a nice
> little list saying "these are the patches that were included in the
> kernel that goes with this distribution"? ;-)
The kernel spec file contains lots of comments about what ea
On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 06:52, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:23:34 +0300
>
> A question. Many seem of the opinion that skipjack is indeed a beta of 7.3
> I was unaware it was a beta release. I was thinking it was, as you say,
> simply a 7.2.92 and 7.2.93 version.
>
> I have seen n
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 16:15, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Why won't redhat release to the public an additional ISO with free programs
> that are not GPL'd? (free as "free beer")
>
> After all - it's just an added value IMHO.
Red Hat shipped 10 CDs with the Red Hat Linux 7.2 Professional Edition.
Fiv
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 10:47, Chris Garrigues wrote:
> When I run 'rpmbuild -bb --target=i686-unknown-linux kernel-2.4.spec' it ends
Try rpmbuild -bb --target=i686 kernel-2.4.spec
You don't need/want the -unknown-linux part.
Thanks.
Peter
___
Redha
Each of these should be filed separately. Bugzilla is organized by
package, so you should only include information about a single SRPM
and/or its generated packages in a single bug.
Thanks.
Peter
On Wed, 2001-11-07 at 09:39, Matilainen Panu (NBI/Helsinki) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are a few packa
11 matches
Mail list logo
