Re: Bind - failed compilation

On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Pekka Savola wrote: Have you tried applying the patches included in bind-8.2.2_P5-25? bind 8.2.2 didn't build cleanly out of the box on RH6.2 either, IIRC. Yep. -- Piotr "Charvel" Majka | PGP GPG Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Uin: 20873695 GCM d- s-:- a- C++

Bind - failed compilation

Welcome RH 7.0, using egsc (kgcc), bind-8.2.3_T6B kgcc -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -pipe -s -mcpu=pentiumpro -march=pentiumpro -ffast-math -mieee-fp -fexpensive-optimizations -fexceptions -o nslookup main.o getinfo.o debug.o send.o skip.o list.o subr.o

Rpm 4.x and mc

Welcome ;) After building package by rpm 4.0 I try to come into package and got: -- Could not parse -- and later mc show only /INFO CONTENTS.cpio HEADER INSTALL UPGRADE Any patch to extfs/rpm ? ;) I use latest mc 4.5.51 -- Piotr "Charvel" Majka | PGP GPG Public Key: finger [EMAIL

procps-2.0.7, broken top on SMP box.

End of strace log: 18908 rt_sigaction(SIGALRM, {SIG_DFL}, NULL, 8) = 0 18908 alarm(0) = 1 18908 close(6) = 0 18908 open("/proc/loadavg", O_RDONLY) = 6 18908 lseek(6, 0, SEEK_SET) = 0 18908 read(6, "0.66 0.49 0.38 1/207 18909\n",

XFree86-4.0.1-30.src.rpm

Welcome :) This package make XFree86 4.0.1 without one enough important file - /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/Cards --- :) -- Piotr "Charvel" Majka | PGP GPG Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Uin: 20873695 GCM d- s-:- a-- C++ UL P+ L+++ E--- W+ N+++ !o !K w--- !O M V- PS+ PE !Y PGP+ t--- !5 X

Re: lynx - failed compilation

On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Michael Tokarev wrote: Huh. This sort of errors should go to maintainers of: - glibc - ncurses This is a serious namespace pollution: macro ERR used by ncurses (curses.h) and somewhere in glibc (ucontext.h), but mean completely different things. Hence the

lynx - failed compilation

Hi [root@link /root]# rpm -q glibc-devel glibc-devel-2.1.3-16 [root@link /root]# rpm -q ncurses ncurses-5.0-14 (own package - 2401 patch) [root@link /root]# When I try building lynx-2.8.3dev-*, lynx-2.8.3pre*, with --with-ncurses and, --with-screen=ncurses and --enable-colors-style I got

Bad glibc or ld.so ?

Hi :) I know... devel soft version, but.. [root@link /root]# rpm -qf `which ldd` glibc-2.1.3-6 [root@link /root]# ldd /usr/sbin/opensshd BUG IN DYNAMIC LINKER ld.so: dynamic-link.h: 57: elf_get_dynamic_info: Assertion `! "bad dynamic tag"' failed! ldd: /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exited with unknown

Re: Bad glibc or ld.so ?

On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Rod Stewart wrote: Just one thing. ld.so is not part of glibc, it does not contain /lib/ld-linux.so.2. It is a backwards compatibility for libc 5 linked applications. You should not be linking against it. /lib/ld-linux.so.2, comes from glibc. Yep, sorry - my

glibc-2.1.3-4 - failed compiling

Hi :) I try recompile that one version with strong optimalization for i686. My optimalization flags are: optflags: i386 -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -pipe -s -mcpu=pentiumpro -march=pentiumpro -ffast-math -mieee-fp -fexpensive-optimizations optflags: i686 -O2

initscripts 4.80-3 - broken sysctl ?

Hi [root@link /root]# rpm -q initscripts initscripts-4.80-3 [root@link /root]# sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.conf net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1 net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter = 1 net.ipv4.ip_always_defrag = 1 kernel.sysrq = 1 warning: /etc/sysctl.conf(9): invalid syntax, continuing... [root@link /root]# cat