From: Bill Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 12:20:33 -0500
> - NFS access didn't work right
> - it broke some other access modes/methods that made it non-POSIX/LSB
> compliant (for example, there were things that root couldn't access,
> even though they ha
Chris Tooley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> What does "instability" specifically refer to?
- NFS access didn't work right
- it broke some other access modes/methods that made it non-POSIX/LSB
compliant (for example, there were things that root couldn't access,
even though they had no ACLs)
Thin
What does "instability" specifically refer to? Were they only shown to
cause instability in certain cases or was it general access? It should
be noted that even if it is mentioned here what was definitely shown to
cause instability, that does not mean that other situations will be
stable. It onl
Peter Bowen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 13:13, Todd Lee wrote:
> > Thanks for the info! I guess I'll keep searching! When you did try to
> > implement ACL support with the RedHat kernel, what patch did you use, and
> > when you got it working which one did you use? Thanks
ACLs are supported and known to work well (especially with Samba) in the
XFS-enabled Red Hat kernel provided by SGI:
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/
XFS has been ported to Linux some years ago, it is perfectly stable in
itself (it's the filesystem used by SGI in the Irix servers), and the
Linux
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 13:13, Todd Lee wrote:
> Thanks for the info! I guess I'll keep searching! When you did try to
> implement ACL support with the RedHat kernel, what patch did you use, and
> when you got it working which one did you use? Thanks in advance!
The EA/ACL patches are actually in
-list-admin@;redhat.com]On Behalf Of Viktor Vislobokov
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 2:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ACL in RedHat
Hi Todd!
> Does Red Hat have a particular patch that works well on implementing ACL
> filesystems? I've found acl.bestbits.at and was just won
Hi Todd!
Does Red Hat have a particular patch that works well on implementing ACL
filesystems? I've found acl.bestbits.at and was just wondering if anyone has
used it with Red Hat 8 (which I really like by the way) and if there were
any problems, or is there a better version I should try?
Tod
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Todd Lee wrote:
> Does Red Hat have a particular patch that works well on implementing ACL
> filesystems? I've found acl.bestbits.at and was just wondering if anyone has
> used it with Red Hat 8 (which I really like by the way) and if there were
> any problems, or is there a be
Does Red Hat have a particular patch that works well on implementing ACL
filesystems? I've found acl.bestbits.at and was just wondering if anyone has
used it with Red Hat 8 (which I really like by the way) and if there were
any problems, or is there a better version I should try?
Does anyone know
10 matches
Mail list logo
