Re: Future of "python2" package/RPMs which require python 2

2002-04-06 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Michal Kurowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Trond Eivind Glomsrřd [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > > > Python 1.5.2 is what's being used in the distribution, python2 is > > there for people to play with/develop for the future with. Note that > > all support modules (database modules, newt, etc)

Re: Future of "python2" package/RPMs which require python 2

2002-04-06 Thread Michal Kurowski
Trond Eivind Glomsrřd [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > Python 1.5.2 is what's being used in the distribution, python2 is > there for people to play with/develop for the future with. Note that > all support modules (database modules, newt, etc) only are shipped for > 1.5.2 > > In the future, python

Re: Future of "python2" package/RPMs which require python 2

2002-04-06 Thread Ben Escoto
> "teg" == Trond Eivind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote the following on 05 Apr 2002 17:57:44 -0500 teg> For the current series: Depend on python2 = ... teg> In the future, python 1.5.2 will be obsoleted and python will teg> be updated to whatever is current/stable at the time. Ok

Re: Future of "python2" package/RPMs which require python 2

2002-04-05 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Ben Escoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How does redhat recommend that RPMs require python >= 2.x? For the current series: Depend on python2 = > In version 7.x it seems that there are separate python (v1.x) and > python2 (2.x) packages, so an RPM cannot simply specify python >= > 2.x. Pyt

Future of "python2" package/RPMs which require python 2

2002-04-05 Thread Ben Escoto
--==_Exmh_1886728034P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii How does redhat recommend that RPMs require python >= 2.x? In version 7.x it seems that there are separate python (v1.x) and python2 (2.x) packages, so an RPM cannot simply specify python >= 2.x. However, other distributions don'