Re: PUMP / DHCP

2000-03-08 Thread Chris Garrigues
> From: Scott Smyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2000 11:54:12 -0800 > > Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > received. It recommend it for a good alternative. If you > > > get RH dhcp SRPM, you just have to add it to the files > > > section or create another package identifier for dhclient.

Re: PUMP / DHCP

2000-03-02 Thread JF Martinez
> > > I'd be interested to know what configurations pump fails in that dhcpcd > > handles. I know some cases pump works dhcpcd doesnt and some where both > > fail. > > > > More data is always good. > > > I don't know how to get such data. The problematical configuration > is at the dhcp s

Re: PUMP / DHCP

2000-03-02 Thread JF Martinez
> > Isn't it about time for RedHat to admit that "pump" sucks? > It was really apalling that you inflicted this virtually untested program > on us in the first place. It has since improved, but the newsgroups still > have posts from people who cannot connect using pump and have to be > instruct

Re: PUMP / DHCP

2000-03-02 Thread Scott Smyth
Alan Cox wrote: > > > received. It recommend it for a good alternative. If you > > get RH dhcp SRPM, you just have to add it to the files > > section or create another package identifier for dhclient. > > Interesting. I've not tried dhclient though I've been using the ISC dhcpd > for ages I t

Re: PUMP / DHCP

2000-03-02 Thread Andrew E. Mileski
Alan Cox wrote: > M$ are pretty reasonable on DHCP compliance. Well, two that I know of: NT used to require null termination of some fields which the RFCs didn't. NT used to not send all info in all phases of the protocol, except the first. Haven't tried NT recently though. > The stuff I'm h

Re: PUMP / DHCP

2000-03-02 Thread Andrew E. Mileski
Scott Smyth wrote: > The dhclient that comes with ISC DHCP server code that > everybody uses is really very good, and you can initiate > scripts before and after that lease is requested and > received. It recommend it for a good alternative. If you > get RH dhcp SRPM, you just have to add it to

Re: PUMP / DHCP

2000-03-02 Thread Alan Cox
> received. It recommend it for a good alternative. If you > get RH dhcp SRPM, you just have to add it to the files > section or create another package identifier for dhclient. Interesting. I've not tried dhclient though I've been using the ISC dhcpd for ages -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubs

Re: PUMP / DHCP

2000-03-02 Thread Alan Cox
> the "violations" of the standard in dhcpcd are necessary to cope with > M$ idiocies in typical servers. Waving the standard doesn't help > the user. M$ are pretty reasonable on DHCP compliance. The stuff I'm helping track is mostly idiot cable modem vendors who basically seem to do 'di

Re: PUMP / DHCP

2000-03-02 Thread Bob Tennent
> I'd be interested to know what configurations pump fails in that dhcpcd > handles. I know some cases pump works dhcpcd doesnt and some where both > fail. > > More data is always good. > I don't know how to get such data. The problematical configuration is at the dhcp server and most cabl

Re: PUMP / DHCP

2000-03-02 Thread Scott Smyth
The dhclient that comes with ISC DHCP server code that everybody uses is really very good, and you can initiate scripts before and after that lease is requested and received. It recommend it for a good alternative. If you get RH dhcp SRPM, you just have to add it to the files section or create a

Re: PUMP / DHCP

2000-03-02 Thread Alan Cox
> It was really apalling that you inflicted this virtually untested program > on us in the first place. It has since improved, but the newsgroups still > have posts from people who cannot connect using pump and have to be > instructed on how to use dhcpcd. Why do you persist in this madness? O

Re: PUMP / DHCP

2000-03-02 Thread Matt Wilson
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 09:22:05PM -0600, Fire Dragon wrote: > I'm tinkering with the new RedHat 6.2beta on my Cyrix 6x86 and noticed > something. > > Every time PUMP tries to renew the DHCP lease on the ethernet adapter the > DHCP server running on the other ethernet adapter passes pump an IP an

Re: PUMP / DHCP

2000-03-02 Thread Bob Tennent
Isn't it about time for RedHat to admit that "pump" sucks? It was really apalling that you inflicted this virtually untested program on us in the first place. It has since improved, but the newsgroups still have posts from people who cannot connect using pump and have to be instructed on how to

PUMP / DHCP

2000-03-01 Thread Fire Dragon
I'm tinkering with the new RedHat 6.2beta on my Cyrix 6x86 and noticed something. Every time PUMP tries to renew the DHCP lease on the ethernet adapter the DHCP server running on the other ethernet adapter passes pump an IP and the cards start a flip flop loop of the IP Addresses. I viewed the