Re: SDL depending on KDE?

2001-02-27 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?Q?Glomsr=F8d?= writes: > > Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Is it reasonable to have SDL and SDL_mixer depending on arts > > > i.e. kdelibs? > > > > arts is in a separate package. > > A binary packa

Re: SDL depending on KDE?

2001-02-27 Thread Svante Signell
Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?Q?Glomsr=F8d?= writes: > Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Is it reasonable to have SDL and SDL_mixer depending on arts > > i.e. kdelibs? > > arts is in a separate package. A binary package yes, source no. > > > -- > Trond Eivind Glomsrød >

Re: SDL depending on KDE?

2001-02-26 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it reasonable to have SDL and SDL_mixer depending on arts > i.e. kdelibs? arts is in a separate package. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc. ___ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] h

SDL depending on KDE?

2001-02-26 Thread Svante Signell
Is it reasonable to have SDL and SDL_mixer depending on arts i.e. kdelibs? Can arts be packaged separately (.src.rpm) or is it an important part of kdelibs (-2.0.20010205-1.src.rpm)? It would be nice to install SDL without the need to build kdelibs (from source, 96 min) to install arts. rpm -Uvh