Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?Q?Glomsr=F8d?= writes:
> > Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Is it reasonable to have SDL and SDL_mixer depending on arts
> > > i.e. kdelibs?
> >
> > arts is in a separate package.
>
> A binary packa
Trond Eivind =?iso-8859-1?Q?Glomsr=F8d?= writes:
> Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is it reasonable to have SDL and SDL_mixer depending on arts
> > i.e. kdelibs?
>
> arts is in a separate package.
A binary package yes, source no.
>
>
> --
> Trond Eivind Glomsrød
>
Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it reasonable to have SDL and SDL_mixer depending on arts
> i.e. kdelibs?
arts is in a separate package.
--
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.
___
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
Is it reasonable to have SDL and SDL_mixer depending on arts
i.e. kdelibs?
Can arts be packaged separately (.src.rpm) or is it an important part of
kdelibs (-2.0.20010205-1.src.rpm)? It would be nice to install
SDL without the need to build kdelibs (from source, 96 min) to install arts.
rpm -Uvh