Re: ppc64

2003-06-10 Thread Franz Sirl
At 03:05 09.06.2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Balint Cristian wrote: > A asure you too from my ibook: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] FILMS]# rpm -qa | grep glibc > glibc-kernheaders-2.4-8.17 > glibc-common-2.3.2-48 > glibc-devel-2.3.2-48 > glibc-2.3.2-48 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] FILMS]# teln

Re: ppc64

2003-06-08 Thread Bill Nottingham
Balint Cristian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > _ALL_ ppc rawhide now are 32 bit except kernel and glibc64 (the 64bit version > of glibc).I think (maybe i am wrong) redhat killed ppc64 tree the 64 bit > version of rawhide because of idea that on real 64 bit machines only kernel > is ru

Re: ppc64

2003-06-08 Thread ncjeffgus
can find out what the heck is causing this! ARGE! > _ALL_ ppc rawhide now are 32 bit except kernel and glibc64 (the 64bit version > of glibc).I think (maybe i am wrong) redhat killed ppc64 tree the 64 bit > version of rawhide because of idea that on real 64 bit machines only kernel

Re: ppc64

2003-06-08 Thread Balint Cristian
You are restating my point. I wanted to make sure rawhide didn't > get ppc64 packages by accident, thus my question. Currently the telnet > ppc.rpm is genereating a Illegal instruction error. As far as I can tell A asure you too from my ibook: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FILMS]# cat /proc

Re: ppc64

2003-06-08 Thread ncjeffgus
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Elliot Lee wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > It's an iBook. Rawhide has amazingly worked pretty well on this > > iBook. :) > > The CPU in this can only execute 32-bit instructions, making 64-bit > (*.ppc64.rpm

Re: ppc64

2003-06-08 Thread Elliot Lee
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It's an iBook. Rawhide has amazingly worked pretty well on this > iBook. :) The CPU in this can only execute 32-bit instructions, making 64-bit (*.ppc64.rpm) packages rather pointless. You probably only got the package to insta

Re: ppc64

2003-06-08 Thread ncjeffgus
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Bill Nottingham wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > I noticed rawhide now has ppc64 gcc and glibc in it. Playing > > around with things I'm already getting an illegal instruction because of > > the ppc64 stuff. Is rawhid

Re: ppc64

2003-06-07 Thread Bill Nottingham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > I noticed rawhide now has ppc64 gcc and glibc in it. Playing > around with things I'm already getting an illegal instruction because of > the ppc64 stuff. Is rawhide going ppc64 only? Or is this only a > transition? Not o

ppc64

2003-06-07 Thread ncjeffgus
I noticed rawhide now has ppc64 gcc and glibc in it. Playing around with things I'm already getting an illegal instruction because of the ppc64 stuff. Is rawhide going ppc64 only? Or is this only a transition? ..