Re: X/GNOME probs after 7.1 upgrade

> Operating System: Linux 2.2.17-8smp i686 [ELF] > > # Uh. 2.2.17? I'm definitely running 2.4.2: > # > uname -a > # Linux palpatine 2.4.2-2 #1 Sun Apr 8 20:41:30 EDT 2001 i686 > # unknown I think (I think, but not sure) that's the OS it was compiled under (remember w

PDF printer?

Hi - I was wondering if it was possible to set up a lpr printer that would take submitted print jobs and convert them to PDF format. I'd like to be able to set up a printer acessible by SAMBA clients that will convert a job to PDF then copy the resulting file to a shared directory for retrieva

Re: Rules for .telnetrc

On Wed, 18 Apr 2001 02:08:44 Hans-Werner Bippus wrote: >.netrc is used for ftp, as I use it, but it does not work with telnet. >The other computer-system does not understand ssh, only telnet. Then you can try rsh or rlogin. If they are using telnet, they might have one of these enabled too. Eithe

is rhl 7.1 on 2.4 kernel?

fredhat-list red hat linux 7.1 on kernel 2.4?which release?2.4.2 or 2.4.3? i'v downloaded and compiled a 2.4.3 kernel.i found the version of header file package is 2.4.0 using rpm -qa|grep kernel.is this right?where can get linux on 2.4 kernel? thanks in advance. xiong zhao __

Re: Rules for .telnetrc

Trond Eivind Glomsrød hat geschrieben: > > Could somebody give me a hint, where to find rules for > > writing a .telnetrc-file, please. > > 1) It's netrc > 2) You don't want it - you want ssh .netrc is used for ftp, as I use it, but it does not work with telnet. The other computer-system does not

Re: FTP program

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001 12:05:30 David Talkington wrote: >If you want a GUI, how about gftp? There's also lynx, which is really a browser, but provides a decent interface for FTP too. Tony -- Anthony E. Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1

Re: SSH Client for Windows

Or, if you really want a full experience, Cygwin. Comes with ssh. -dwd- Ahbaid Gaffoor wrote: > putty > > fits on a floppy too! > > badger wrote: > > > Tera Term Pro with SSH... find it on just about any windows shareware web > > site. [...] ___

Graceful shutdown

Hi Which is the most graceful shutdown for LINUX/UNIX init 0 or shutdown or shutdown with time TIA ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Arrrggghhh I have HAD IT !!! [Redhat Mirror]

If this is the case, why then release the iso at all ? I would then have to install 7.0, do all the patches, all the rpms for evey upgrade to 7.1. For me it is just much easier to download the new (well not in this case ) iso, cut the CD and get cooking with the new version. I like a product that

Redhat 7.1/kernel 2.4.2 & disk geometry on boot

Hi I have a laptop which I used fips to create a linux partition on years ago. When I did this, the partitions did not end on cylinder boundries, but everything worked fine so I never worried about it. It has run several versions of linux (up to 7.0 beta) fine. Now, when running the 7.1 install

Re: X/GNOME probs after 7.1 upgrade

You should probably file that in bugzilla to one see if there was a resolution and two if not they can find the problem and get it fixed. It's not a bug if not on bugzilla. Mike - Original Message - From: "Emil Eifrém" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 17

Re: RH7.1 Failing on install

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Robert A. Hayden wrote: > Ok, as a follow up to this install problem. > > I have re-downloaded and re-burned the ISOs. I tried the burned CDs again > on 5 different machines: > On each system, it boots fine, sees the CD, I enter "text" as the install > mode, and then it wil

Re: kinda [OT]; What's AOL up to?

Hi David, On Tuesday, April 17, 2001, 9:58:24 PM, you babbled something about: DLD> Anybody have any idea what AOL's up to? I'm getting at DLD> least one of these a week. Looks very similar to the DLD> abuse.net relay test. A Google search results of several DLD> people seeing this, but no an

Re: RH7.1 Failing on install

Ok, as a follow up to this install problem. I have re-downloaded and re-burned the ISOs. I tried the burned CDs again on 5 different machines: Old P133 Desktop Production RH6.2 SCSI running off an adaptec 7880 SCSI A new Dual P3-866 all-scsi system A dell Dimens

Re: scanning the scanner

More likely, that person is 0wn3d by someone who thinks they are 31337. They are launching attacks against other machines from a machine they've comprimised. You should notify the maintainer of that IP. thornton On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, kelsey wrote: > Chances are, that box is running portwatch

Re: scanning the scanner

Chances are, that box is running portwatcher... it fakes open ports so it looks like a whole bunch of stuff is open that really isn't On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, you wrote: > i just got scanned. i in turn scanned them. this is what i got back. > are they compromised? (look at the last one) > > eric >

Re: Redhat 7.1 iso's :: kernel 2.4.2 && pcmcia

Thanks much.. its the same as mine (but i'm a version higher) hunting around on the net it seems that the 2.4* kernel really isn't up to snuff w/ laptops.. I've tried turning off the kernel subsystem and recompiling the latest -cs seperately and get a slew of error messages and eventually

X/GNOME probs after 7.1 upgrade

Greets. I just upgraded from 7.0 to 7.1 using the normal "Upgrade" path on the CDs. The upgrade went smooth but I've run into some weird problems with X/GNOME. Brief overview -- * I cannot launch a gnome terminal. When I click on the icon, nothing happens at all. No user-visible

7.1 and tin?

First complaint. my fav newsreader appears to be gone! I'm sure it was in fisher (Just did a fresh install, so can't check). I'll grab the source and compile, but we don't want the future masses of Red Hat Linux users to miss out on this great and legendary news reader! ;-) Let's hope this

kinda [OT]; What's AOL up to?

Anybody have any idea what AOL's up to? I'm getting at least one of these a week. Looks very similar to the abuse.net relay test. A Google search results of several people seeing this, but no answers. AOL's obviously trying to find an open relay, but why? This machine is primarily a mail serv

Re: bzImage from compiled kernel

teekay wrote: > > Hi there, > > Can bzImage be produced from an already compiled kernel? > (It is an older kernel, for which I no longer have the compile > environment around, and I would like to build a boot CD). > Most kernels are bzImages. If when you run file on it and it says x86 boot

Re: Redhat 7.1 iso's :: kernel 2.4.2 && pcmcia

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Avijit Ghosh blurted out: AG>On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Chuck Mead wrote: AG> AG>> AG>> Could it be the network card that you have? (grasping at straws!) AG> AG> Its possible i've googled about a bit.. and I believe the AG>xircom card buses have some problems w/ the 2.4 kernel

Re: ipfwadm help

> > > I am a bit rusty with ipfwadm, but I'll give it a try. > > ipfwadm -I -a accept -P udp -S 0.0.0.0:68 -W eth0 > ipfwadm -O -a accept -P udp -S 192.168.1.0/24:67 > ipfwadm -I -a deny -P udp -S 0.0.0.0/0 67:69 -W ppp0 > ipfwadm -O -a deny -P udp -S 0.0.0.0/0 67:69 -W ppp0 > > If you want to t

Re: ipfwadm help

On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Ken Cole wrote: > Hi All, > > I have just configured dhcpd on a RH5.2 server as per the > mini-howto by Vladimir Vuksan. Very helpfull. > > All appears to be working except my firewall rules are > stopping the packets getting to the dhcp server. > > in /var/log/kernel I am g

RE: Port Scan on Port 111

Ward William E DLDN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: | Hey folks, I'm getting portscanned constantly on tcp Port Scanned on | Port 111 on a machine I have as a firewall. | | /etc/services lists that as sunrpc 111/tcp portmapper (RPC 4.0 | portmapper). | | Ok... it's not open that I can tell, so I'm not

Re: Redhat 7.1 iso's :: kernel 2.4.2 && pcmcia

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Chuck Mead wrote: > > Could it be the network card that you have? (grasping at straws!) Its possible i've googled about a bit.. and I believe the xircom card buses have some problems w/ the 2.4 kernel however the error messages are pretty specific to just pcmcia just

Re: v2.4.3 vs v2.2.19

At 03:01 PM 12/04/2001 -0400, you wrote: >On the other hand, I tried using hdparm to shut off dma usage, then telling >it to keep the settings, and upon reboot the same thing happened >again. When I >try to tell the drive to keep settings over reset, I get an error >returned. I'm >guessing thi

Re: Redhat 7.1 iso's :: kernel 2.4.2 && pcmcia

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Avijit Ghosh blurted out: AG>On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Chuck Mead wrote: AG> AG>> AG>> Just FYI... AG> AG> Thanks... we have the same pcmcia and the same AG>/etc/sysconfig/pcmcia .. I have an MD5sum checked iso image that AG>i'm just going to reburn if the PCIC=yenta_socket do

Re: Port Scan on Port 111

In my area, Comcast security hits my router everyhour on Port 111. Why? I don't know. You'd think if they were looking for illegal servers (what! Me running smtp?) they'd use a more common port. mw Ryan McAdams wrote: > > Im no genious but this is what snort has listed in its rules database:

Re: netcfg

Ted Gervais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello Guys.. > > I seemed to have lost all my files related to 'netcfg'. They just disappeared. > I still have the binary file though as it is the one complaining about the > missing files.. > > Is there a way to get these files back? I seem to find

Re: bzImage from compiled kernel

On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, teekay wrote: > Hi there, > > Can bzImage be produced from an already compiled kernel? > (It is an older kernel, for which I no longer have the compile > environment around, and I would like to build a boot CD). > > thanks in advance, > tk > Anthony K. Transportation Systems

netcfg

Hello Guys.. I seemed to have lost all my files related to 'netcfg'. They just disappeared. I still have the binary file though as it is the one complaining about the missing files.. Is there a way to get these files back? I seem to find this utility better than linuxconf, so it would be ni

Re: Port Scan on Port 111

they're trying to overflow nfsd. As long as you have the updated nfs-tools package you should be fine. There is a way I found to be able to block these attempts though. I put this in hosts.deny portmap:ALL and in hosts.allow ALL: whatever IP address you want to allow to mount NFS On Tue, 1

RE: scanning the scanner

It's hard to say. You shouldn't be able to see some of those ports at all. Either they have been hacked or they are a script kiddie with no sense at all (which characterizes most of them anyway. Find out who owns the IP. > -Original Message- > From: eric clover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Redhat 7.1 iso's :: kernel 2.4.2 && pcmcia

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Chuck Mead wrote: > > Just FYI... Thanks... we have the same pcmcia and the same /etc/sysconfig/pcmcia .. I have an MD5sum checked iso image that i'm just going to reburn if the PCIC=yenta_socket doesn't work.. i'm really at a loss as to what to do :( -avi

scanning the scanner

i just got scanned. i in turn scanned them. this is what i got back. are they compromised? (look at the last one) eric Starting nmap V. 2.53 by [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) Interesting ports on (61.33.33.104): (The 1502 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed) Po

Re: System (security) monitors?

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Mike Chambers blurted out: MC>Try this link and check out logcheck and portsentry. MC> MC>http://www.psionic.com MC> MC>I haven't checked but these may or may not be on the powertools cd as well. They are both on the powertools CD from Seawolf as well as hostsentry. -- Chuc

Re: Redhat 7.1 iso's :: kernel 2.4.2 && pcmcia

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Avijit Ghosh blurted out: AG>On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Chuck Mead wrote: AG> AG>> On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Avijit Ghosh blurted out: AG>> The only thing I can think is that maybe your ISO was bad? AG>> AG>> -- AG>> Chuck Mead, csm -AT- moongroup.com, Owner, MoonGroup.com AG>> (Note: h

RE: ALS 4000 sound card

Brian: Ya, that's what I was looking for. Thanks a lot, Eddie Strohmier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian Ashe Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 4:49 PM To: Eddie Strohmier Subject: Re: ALS 4000 sound card Hi Eddie, On Tuesday, Apri

Re: ALS 4000 sound card

Hi Eddie, On Tuesday, April 17, 2001, 5:38:03 PM, you babbled something about: ES> Hello: ES> Anyone know if there is support for the ALS 4000 sound card ES> by Avance Logic in RH 7.1 (Seawolf). When I was using ES> Wolverine the installer would identify the card properly but ES> then installer

ALS 4000 sound card

Hello: Anyone know if there is support for the ALS 4000 sound card by Avance Logic in RH 7.1 (Seawolf). When I was using Wolverine the installer would identify the card properly but then installer would also say that "there is no support". I have e-mailed Avance and received no response other th

Re: Port Scan on Port 111

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 04:16:45PM -0400, Ward William E DLDN wrote: > Ok so after checking CERT, I've found there are well known > exploits of rpc.statd, and that I'm probably being "Ramen" > scanned in all likelihood. > > Since I've got the latest and greatest on the machine, I'm set. > No

RE: file size limit?

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Warren Melnick wrote: > > > I'm sorry, I'm sure this is a FAQ, but I'm trying to set up a VMWare > Linux box, hosted on another Linux box, and it won't let me create a > virtual disk larger than 2047MB. > > The error message I get suggests that this is due to a file size limit

Re: FTP program

On Tuesday 17 April 2001 13:05, you wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Ted Gervais wrote: > >Wondering if there is a nice ftp program out there for RedHat. > >I am used to doing everything from the command line, but it would be nice > > to be able to save my locations and s/dirs somew

Re: FTP program

On Tuesday 17 April 2001 12:16, you wrote: > On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Ted Gervais wrote: > > Wondering if there is a nice ftp program out there for RedHat. > > I am used to doing everything from the command line, but it would be nice > > to be able to save my locations and s/dirs somewhere so I can fi

Re: file size limit?

"Michael R. Jinks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm sorry, I'm sure this is a FAQ, but I'm trying to set up a VMWare > Linux box, hosted on another Linux box, and it won't let me create a > virtual disk larger than 2047MB. > > The error message I get suggests that this is due to a file size lim

RE: FTP program

>From the command line just enter "ncftp" when you get the ftp prompt, enter "o" (for open). Warren Melnick Director of Research and Development Astata Corporation -Original Message- From: Ted Gervais [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 5:13 PM To

Re: Rules for .telnetrc

Hans-Werner Bippus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Could somebody give me a hint, where to find rules for > writing a .telnetrc-file, please. 1) It's netrc 2) You don't want it - you want ssh -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc. ___ Redhat-list ma

Re: FTP program

On Tuesday 17 April 2001 12:16, you wrote: > On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Ted Gervais wrote: > > Wondering if there is a nice ftp program out there for RedHat. > > I am used to doing everything from the command line, but it would be nice > > to be able to save my locations and s/dirs somewhere so I can fi

RE: file size limit?

Yes, use a partition instead of a virtual drive. Warren Melnick Director of Research and Development Astata Corporation -Original Message- From: Michael R. Jinks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 5:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: file size

RE: Gnome 1.4

It does not work with 7.1 yet. Warren Melnick Director of Research and Development Astata Corporation -Original Message- From: Mike Chambers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 5:04 PM To: RedHat - SeaWolf Subject: Gnome 1.4 Does anyone know if

file size limit?

I'm sorry, I'm sure this is a FAQ, but I'm trying to set up a VMWare Linux box, hosted on another Linux box, and it won't let me create a virtual disk larger than 2047MB. The error message I get suggests that this is due to a file size limit in ext2fs. Is there some way around this? -- ~~~Mich

Rules for .telnetrc

Hi, Could somebody give me a hint, where to find rules for writing a .telnetrc-file, please. I want to connect to another system (OS-9) without typing again and again user name and password. Thanks in advance. Hans-Werner Bippus ___ Redhat-list ma

bzImage from compiled kernel

Hi there, Can bzImage be produced from an already compiled kernel? (It is an older kernel, for which I no longer have the compile environment around, and I would like to build a boot CD). thanks in advance, tk Anthony K. Transportation Systems - no HTML mail please.

Re: System (security) monitors?

Try this link and check out logcheck and portsentry. http://www.psionic.com I haven't checked but these may or may not be on the powertools cd as well. Mike - Original Message - From: "Ashley M. Kirchner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Red Hat Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday

Re: Redhat 7.1 iso's :: kernel 2.4.2 && pcmcia

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Chuck Mead wrote: > On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Avijit Ghosh blurted out: > The only thing I can think is that maybe your ISO was bad? > > -- > Chuck Mead, csm -AT- moongroup.com, Owner, MoonGroup.com > (Note: html formatted email sent to me is filtered & deleted unread) > GnuPG Pub

RE: Arrrggghhh I have HAD IT !!! [Redhat Mirror]

I for one like to get the distros asap and put them on my test box. It just gives me familiarity with the current distro level to help and test with on a vanilla install. -Ryan -Original Message- From: Brad Bonkoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 4:22 PM To: [

RE: Why is there no rsync to redhat's ftp server

[root@www /root]# python Python 1.5.2 (#1, Sep 15 2000, 09:23:56) [GCC egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs- on linux-i386 Copyright 1991-1995 Stichting Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam >>> -Original Message- From: Pieter De Wit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 4:1

Re: Arrrggghhh I have HAD IT !!! [Redhat Mirror]

Does the world really turn on releases and availability of new Red Hat versions? What is wrong with building your own kernel, or perhaps if you want the new mod-utils to get the RPM and 'rpm -U' them yourself? Isn't that the wonders of Linux...you _should_ not have to wait for RedHat to do it, y

Build apache rpm with -lpthread

Hi, I was wondering if anyone knows how to specify in apache's .spec that it should build the rpm with lpthread support. thanks. __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ _

Why is there no rsync to redhat's ftp server

Hello Ryan, My system updates everyday, so I think I am running the latest that up2date provides. How can I check this ? Thanks, Pieter ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Port Scan on Port 111

Ok so after checking CERT, I've found there are well known exploits of rpc.statd, and that I'm probably being "Ramen" scanned in all likelihood. Since I've got the latest and greatest on the machine, I'm set. Now, I need to see why I'm not getting hits on my firewall logs for the FTP service

RE: Why is there no rsync to redhat's ftp server

What version of python are you running? -Original Message- From: Pieter De Wit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 4:00 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Why is there no rsync to redhat's ftp server Importance: High Hello Ryan, I have tried emirror, but the pro

Reboot Freezes After Install

Hello All, I am having the problem noted in the subject line. More specifically, after the message: Starting Linuxconf.[OK] comes it just freezes. Now normally I would boot off of floppies, mount the hard drive then and look into what could be causing the freeze in rc.local, but I am running

empty email

Im using the mail command to send me my some log files every week...but when i get the email, the files are not sent,..here is the command line i used: mail -s "weekly logs" < /root/weekly.log [EMAIL PROTECTED] am i missing something here?...why its the file not being sent with the email? any h

Why is there no rsync to redhat's ftp server

Hello Ryan, I have tried emirror, but the problem is that I often get disconnected. Now I am not blaming emirror/the remote host for this. I am sure that the problem lies on this side...On big transfers I have had little to no luck because of problems on the inet. Thanks, Pieter

RE: System (security) monitors?

Actually, I decided to go with a Linux based appliance Firewall... http://www.smoothwall.org It's free, it's small, it'll do either PPP, ISDN, or Network firewalling (T1, T3, External ISDN, External Cablemodem, etc.), and has the ability to even have a DMZ. Works great on throw-away quality ha

RE: Why is there no rsync to redhat's ftp server

Emirror will mirror it for you as an anonymous user, but it doesn't have a priority login. -Original Message- From: Pieter De Wit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 3:50 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Why is there no rsync to redhat's ftp server Hello W

RE: Why is there no rsync to redhat's ftp server

Hello Warren, Sorry about the urgent thing...default setting on mail client. We all know that users all pay attention to IT messages :) Now, Hello Trond, How do I then become part of this "mirror group" I have tried in the past...sending messages to redhat-mirror@ or something like that.

RE: System (security) monitors?

I like snort the best. www.snort.org -Ryan -Original Message- From: Ashley M. Kirchner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 3:49 PM To: Red Hat Mailing List Subject: System (security) monitors? What are the best (or perhaps the most common) firewall (and othe

System (security) monitors?

What are the best (or perhaps the most common) firewall (and otherwise other types of servers) programs that people are using to monitor things like portscans, sniffers and what not. Basically stuff to detect malicious attacks, intrusions and what not. Obviously they go (I assume) hand in h

Re: Port Scan on Port 111

111 is the door to all the Portmapper services, and the one of greatest current interest is rpc.statd. Look at www.cert.org and search for rpc.statd. There are known bugs in some versions that allow a root compromise. The recent 'Linux worms', e.g., Ramen and Lion, use the rpc.statd vulnerabi

RE: Port Scan on Port 111

Im no genious but this is what snort has listed in its rules database: http://www.snort.org/Files/03152001/rpc.rules You might find that a bit interesting to help... Maybe not... I would suggest running snort it will give you some details as to what they are trying to do :) -Ryan -Original

Re: RH7.1 Failing on install

Sounds like exactly the problem I just went thru w/ my P133. Of all the bizarre things, it ended up being that the hard drive shortly thereafter started 'klunking' and went bad. Replaced the HD, and no problems since. Monte Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 07:27:36 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From:

Port Scan on Port 111

Hey folks, I'm getting portscanned constantly on tcp Port Scanned on Port 111 on a machine I have as a firewall. /etc/services lists that as sunrpc 111/tcp portmapper (RPC 4.0 portmapper). Ok... it's not open that I can tell, so I'm not in danger... but I find it curious that's the port everyone

RE: Wondering....

Wow I am on a grammer role today. Are there requirements? -Original Message- From: Ryan McAdams Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 3:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Wondering How do these mirrors get to be official? Are their requirements? Regards, Ryan McAdams

Wondering....

How do these mirrors get to be official? Are their requirements? Regards, Ryan McAdams ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Why is there no rsync to redhat's ftp server

You do the rsync thingie, but the mirrors did not open themselves up until last night. So everyone that wanted to grab a copy of rh71 yesterday during the day had no choice except to hammer ftp.redhat.com until the mirrors ran their sync, which in most cases happens overnight. W

RE: Why is there no rsync to redhat's ftp server

Peter, Why do you send all of your messages to this list as urgent? This is a miling list. Please send messages with normal urgency. Warren Melnick Director of Research and Development Astata Corporation -Original Message- From: Pieter De Wit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Why is there no rsync to redhat's ftp server

Pieter De Wit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello Guys and Gals, > > Dear RedHat, > > Why don't you guys provide rsync services to your mirrors ? I just had a > GREAT idea.. ( at least I think so...) If you where to select say one > or two providers in a continent (NA,SA,Eur etc) and mirror to

Why is there no rsync to redhat's ftp server

Hello Guys and Gals, Dear RedHat, Why don't you guys provide rsync services to your mirrors ? I just had a GREAT idea.. ( at least I think so...) If you where to select say one or two providers in a continent (NA,SA,Eur etc) and mirror to them first/give them dedicated bandwidth to mirror, it wi

RE: iptables not in any manual

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Ryan McAdams wrote: > That is exactly what I am getting at. > > Firewalling is NOT something your average user does. But it IS something that they SHOULD be doing, and will if we make it simple enough. Problem is that ipchains has a lot written about it, with lots of places

Re: Redhat 7.1 iso's :: kernel 2.4.2 && pcmcia

> > The only thing I can think is that maybe your ISO was bad? Yea.. i'm a bit worried about that.. these were supposed to be the official 7.1 iso's (from two separate sources) but the fact that they didn't even burn is bad karma (i.e. the convoluted way i had to remkisofs them) they in

Re: iptables not in any manual

>That is exactly what I am getting at. > >Firewalling is NOT something your average user does. So that user ends up getting attacked and possibly entered. If I read the press release correctly, some firewalling stuff is turned on automatically now. If that is indeed true, that is even more reas

Arrrggghhh I have HAD IT !!!

Hello Guys and Gals, Please Please Please can some one from South Africa that has the 7.1 iso's respond to this messages. I am looking for them since the TWO (yes count them !) mirrors hasn't EVEN MIRRORED wolverine !!! Also can I ask that the SA Guys contact me, I would like to setup some mirror

Re: Redhat 7.1 iso's :: kernel 2.4.2 && pcmcia

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Avijit Ghosh blurted out: AG>On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Avijit Ghosh wrote: AG> AG>> On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Chuck Mead wrote: AG>> modules or am I getting weird errors because I did an upgrade path? Since AG>> the 2.4.2-2 source is sitting around i'll try recompiling that and see if

Re: iptables not in any manual

>Vidiot wrote: > >>Firewalling is as important, if not more important >>these days, than setting up printers. > >It's also way beyond the scope of an OS installation guide. >David Talkington You'll get no argument from me on that point. That is why I went looking at the configuration guide and t

Re: Redhat 7.1 iso's :: kernel 2.4.2 && pcmcia

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Avijit Ghosh wrote: > On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Chuck Mead wrote: > modules or am I getting weird errors because I did an upgrade path? Since > the 2.4.2-2 source is sitting around i'll try recompiling that and see if > it helps.. In reply to myself I recompiled the kerne

RE: iptables not in any manual

That is exactly what I am getting at. Firewalling is NOT something your average user does. -Original Message- From: David Talkington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 2:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: iptables not in any manual -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MES

Re: iptables not in any manual

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Vidiot wrote: >Firewalling is as important, if not more important >these days, than setting up printers. It's also way beyond the scope of an OS installation guide. - -d - -- David Talkington http://www.spotnet.org PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/

RH PPP Dialer (rp3)

I have seen some traffic on this but no answer. Since upgrading to RH 7.0 , rp3 fails with "failed to activate interface" message. This occurs whether started from an icon (RH PPP Dialer) or command line. However, I CAN make the connection and access the internet by using the Dialup Configurator

Re: iptables not in any manual

>Insanity... I guess you expect them to put in there how to put the cd in >the cdrom. > >Your being way to nitpicky. Excuse me!!! Firewalling is as important, if not more important these days, than setting up printers. Yet, printer configuration is one of the chapters in the configurati

Re: Redhat 7.1 iso's :: kernel 2.4.2 && pcmcia

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Chuck Mead wrote: > It's runing fine on my laptop and pcmcia works without error. I have a: > CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1225 I'm running the same bridge.. one thing I notice is that I am also getting some errors on w/ regards to the modules which is likely

Re: floppy booting

Well, if you're booting windows, you're definitely not booting it off of a floppy disk, which is why it is still quick. If you're referring to booting from a floppy into DOS, you're loading nothing more than a cmd shell instead of a complete fully functioning operating system with driver support

Re: Redhat 7.1 iso's :: kernel 2.4.2 && pcmcia

It's runing fine on my laptop and pcmcia works without error. I have a: CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1225 On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Avijit Ghosh blurted out: AG> Now my main issue thusfar is that my pcmcia stuff doesn't work at AG>all anymore which means i'm off the net :( (Apparantly it

RE: iptables not in any manual

Insanity... I guess you expect them to put in there how to put the cd in the cdrom. Your being way to nitpicky. -Original Message- From: Vidiot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 12:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: iptables not in any manual >Why not use

Re: PPTP

Ive been playing with pptp recently, one machine worked flawlessly (test machine) the other 2 (client boxes) I tried this with gave me the same error you have, I went rounds with this for some time. My solution was to chmod 775 /dev/pts which seemed to fix the problem on the 2 problematic machines

Re: Has anyone done an Oracle install with 7.1?

You could do all of this in 7.0. Only problem is that at the end of the day, while you can complete and install, you can not run an instance of the database. At least I can not. I am hoping htis gets solved soon. Until it does I am on 6.2. Paul Anderson J Hayward wrote: > >From the release

Re: Booting to Runlevel 5

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001 09:09:16 -0700, Brad Bonkoski wrote: >Look at '/etc/inittab' near the bottom, it should tell you when to runs the X >daemon look for 'xdm' >HTH IIDH! Thank you. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman

RE: Booting to Runlevel 5

On Tue, 17 Apr 2001 12:16:18 -0400, Warren Melnick wrote: >Look at the last entry in /etc/inittab Yes! Thank you. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

  1   2   >