then sent when connection is made. But this option has also
> resulted that all the mails downloaded by fetchmail are also put in
> /var/spool/mqueue. Is there any option to send mail directly to their
> mailbox when fetchmail downloads mails from pop server.
>
Have the users use procmail as
t, then you probably didn't restart sshd.
>
Yeah, I checked, and my sshd_config file has not changed for a long time.
I know for certain I've been blocked out without a RSA key before this
incident. I'll try to reproduce the error. Thanks.
--
Jiann-Ming Su [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3]: Failed password for jsu2 from 10.1.209.219 port
3774 ssh2
Mar 20 14:37:21 myhost sshd[1433]: Connection closed by 10.1.209.219
--
Jiann-Ming Su [EMAIL PROTECTED] 404-712-2603
Development Team Systems Administrator
General Libraries Systems Division
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscr
Okay, found my problem. The group ID was set on execution. I simply
did a "chmod g-s" and the problem was solved. Thanks for all the inputs.
--
Jiann-Ming Su [EMAIL PROTECTED] 404-712-2603
Development Team Systems Administrator
General Libraries Systems Division
--
redhat-li
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
> Did anyone else notice upgrading to apache-1.3.27 broke some cgi perl scripts.
> My perl scripts have broken with "Premature end of script headers" error.
> According to the error_log, it seems like the @INC variable isn't set
&g
it, please enlighten me.
Thanks. BTW, I'm using 7.2.
--
Jiann-Ming Su [EMAIL PROTECTED] 404-712-2603
Development Team Systems Administrator
General Libraries Systems Division
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
/bin/mysqladmin flush-logs
fi
endscript
}
Any ideas why the logs aren't being rotated properly under cron?
--
Jiann-Ming Su [EMAIL PROTECTED] 404-712-2603
Development Team Systems Administrator
General Libraries Systems Division
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mai
nk to. If I manually
create the symlink, then the compiler doesn't complain. Seems like the
distribution should have these symlinks already.
--
Jiann-Ming Su [EMAIL PROTECTED] 404-712-2603
Development Team Systems Administrator
General Libraries Systems Division
--
redhat-list ma
you hours,
days, or weeks of headaches for a twenty minute upgrade. As the adage goes, if it's
not broke, don't fix it.
--
Jiann-Ming Su [EMAIL PROTECTED] 404-712-2603
Development Team Systems Administrator
General Libraries Systems Division
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscrib
at the traffic on the scope I can see the
> workstation sending to my server, but nothing is sent back.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
Make sure there's no firewall rules blocking ntpd connections. I though
ntpd was configured to be a server as well by default in red
//rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2002-160.html will patch
>my existing installations of OpenSSL or is there any other way.
>
> I'd appreciate if any of you gurus can guide me on this issue.
>
Long story: Read through last week's archive.
Short story: You're good if you a
h this week's archives. There's already been a discussion over
this initiated by my own ignornace. Search for CERT, worm, openssl, etc.
But, the short answer is yes. The 0.9.6b-28 rpm package from RedHat is not
vulnerable to the worm. They backported the patch. In fact, the RH f
> wouldn't work..
>
> can anyone answer this?
>
Login to https://rhn.redhat.com and make the changes.
--
Jiann-Ming Su [EMAIL PROTECTED] 404-712-2603
Development Team Systems Administrator
General Libraries Systems Division
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAI
S240.
>
Get the 7.3 CDs and give a shot. Chances are pretty good it'll install
with minimal fuss.
--
Jiann-Ming Su [EMAIL PROTECTED] 404-712-2603
Development Team Systems Administrator
General Libraries Systems Division
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
On 17 Sep 2002, Saul Arias wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 16:19, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
> > I think the latest openssl from (0.9.6b-28) was releaseed at the end of July.
> > I've done regular up2dates on a weekly basis. I'm not sure that I restarted
> > httpd imme
On 17 Sep 2002, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 11:26, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
> > Does RH have an updated RPMS to secure this vulnerablility? I'm currently
> > running RH7.3 with the latest updates from rhn:
>
> > However, the .bugtraq.c so
rom source code? Thanks for
any info.
--
Jiann-Ming Su [EMAIL PROTECTED] 404-712-2603
Development Team Systems Administrator
General Libraries Systems Division
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
17 matches
Mail list logo