em. This determines which ports inetd will
will listen on.
>
> Should I use something else for a pop3 server? Is procmail a pop3 server?
> If I stick with IMAP, how do I make it use the standard port?
>
No, not unless you have a reason to change. You have all the software
neede
should find the HP drivers.
HTH
John McKinney
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, Christian Campbell wrote:
> Just installed MailScanner/Spamassassin/F-Prot, and all is working great!
> However, I've noticed that if you change Spamassassin configuration files,
> it doesn't take, almost as if MailScanner's settings supercede
> Spamassassin's. I'm trying to
eir products.
>
This was my experince also. I had used there products for several years.
Finally gave up around 2000. The easiest I have found for RH is F-Prot.
Run it with Sendmail/MailScanner. Works great.
HTH
John McKinney
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul Rei
edhat linux
> > > server?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> >
> > Trend Microsystems has a fairly decent virus scanner for Linux
>
> Not in my experience.
>
>
I agree.
John McKinney
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
tackle the problem I'll be happy to let it
> die.
>
> Regards, Mike Klinke
>
>
>
If you check your domain at dnsreport.com it shows that the reverse lookup
for 67.153.21.10 is not working. This would cause the problem you are
describing. Does your upstream
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Alex wrote:
Alex,
Either will work. In sendmail you need to create the virtual user
table (/etc/mail/virtusertable). Add the entries you want
[EMAIL PROTECTED] admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] alex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] xxx
Then hash the table. This will create
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Daryl Hunt wrote:
Daryl,
> I used one of the machines on a different IP and with it's own Domain Name
> to send a message through the relay on the Nix Machine. Here is the error
> message.
>
> The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected by
> the
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Joseph A Nagy Jr wrote:
Joseph,
> Although I no longer have the device in question (got pissed and gave it
> to my future bro-in-law), I have some questions that I'd like answered
> before I blow another $20-$40 on a USB PCI card.
>
I'd agree. You need to find out wh
