Robert Hart wrote:
>at Red Hat would make your toes curl with anticipation :-) - but
>neither are we going to abandon our most active proponents!
Amen!! I hope this statement still rings true in 5 years. Note that I think
it will!!
laterz,
jim
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata a
hello all,
I have a weird problem with a new rh5.0 installation. I am currently using
4.2 and want to upgrade to 5.0. I installed 5.0 on a fresh hard drive and all
went well. I then copied over the kernel that I currently use on the same
system (I changed hd's so that I could fall back to 4.2 jus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Mar 1998 20:12:46 -0500, Paul Anderson wrote:
>
>>My personal rule of thumb is when Donnie and Erik disappear from the
>>list for more than three days, a new release is about to come out.
>
>Well, this doesn't hold much water anymore as Donnie isn't even on t
>I have an old 386dx-40 laying around and was thinking about using it as a
>router for a limited home network (maybe 2 or 3 workstations). It would be
>used mainly as the gateway to my ISP for the other machines. My question
>is.. is such a small horsepower machine worth even considering for this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I realize this is a Linux list server, but I prefer to play fair.
>I've been running NT ever since version 3.1 and it has NEVER crashed
>on me without a good reason, and a solution readily available. All in
>all my NT has been stable as a rock. I believe people badmout
hello all,
I got the following message tonight and I'm wondering just exactly what it
might mean... this is the first time I've seen something like this before:
SCSI disk error : host 0 channel 0 id 0 lun 0 return code = 2802
extra data not valid Current error sd08:01: sns = 70 4
Raw sense d
