Peter Blomgren wrote:
> Ted,
>
> I was too tired to touch this the first time around... There
> are multiple issues here all bundled up in a big tar-ball of
> confusion, but I'll take a stab at it.
>
> > I know I'll get a response if I say the following: "Red Hat knows
> > that Postgresql is a s
Ted,
I was too tired to touch this the first time around... There
are multiple issues here all bundled up in a big tar-ball of
confusion, but I'll take a stab at it.
> I know I'll get a response if I say the following: "Red Hat knows
> that Postgresql is a superior database package"
Even bette
too many questions to answer. Maybe break them up into multiple emails?
As far as postgresql and mysql goes, how about installing them and trying
them yourself? They are both pretty easy to setup and get goign with 9in
rpm form anyway)
charles
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, p-thilts wrote:
> Am resending
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Am resending this as I got no response from the list the first time.
> It seems that most of the list that uses a database seems to prefer
> MySQL yet the Red Hat distribution provides Postgresql. I know I'll
> get a response if I say the following: "Red Hat knows that
Am resending this as I got no response from the list the first time.
It seems that most of the list that uses a database seems to prefer
MySQL yet the Red Hat distribution provides Postgresql. I know I'll get
a response if I say the following: "Red Hat knows that Postgresql is a
superior database
