Re: [OT] gnomecal vs ical in scripts

2000-10-02 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 06:32:46PM -0400, kf wrote: > > You could still use bc. > Those are calendar programs. -- Hal B [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.red

Re: [OT] gnomecal vs ical in scripts

2000-10-02 Thread kf
You could still use bc. hth, kf -- My recommendation: Don't shop at Explorer Micro, Columbus, Ohio. On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Anthony E . Greene wrote: = I've been using ical for a while. I tried gnomecal, but it seems to require a = DISPLAY be set and available, even when using the "-list" comm

[OT] gnomecal vs ical in scripts

2000-09-16 Thread Anthony E . Greene
I've been using ical for a while. I tried gnomecal, but it seems to require a DISPLAY be set and available, even when using the "-list" commandline which just outputs to STDOUT. Am I missing something or is this thing really that limited? What's the point of output to STDOUT if X is required for