Re: 6.2 vs 6.1

2000-04-18 Thread Conrad Harriss
I too see the 6.1 - 6.2 upgrade as an incremental step toward a RH 7.0, which will most likely include the stuff you said (kernel 2.4, gcc-3.x, apache 2.x), plus stuff like XFree86 4.0.something, bash2 as the *standard* bash (can't we toss bash1 out the window yet, or at least do like

Re: 6.2 vs 6.1

2000-04-17 Thread Philippe Moutarlier
I have the same feeling ... before installing it ! I actually have bought the CD .. It is sitting there and I am not very exited about installing it : I will get old enlightemnent , old gnome , my little beloved ipchains , ppp scripts will be smashed etc ... BTW, I followed the little

Re: 6.2 vs 6.1

2000-04-17 Thread Jason Costomiris
On Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 01:44:55PM -0700, Peter Blomgren wrote: : That's an interesting statement. Can you elaborate? I've been around : since 5.1, and either this is the best upgrade (in my opinion), or I've : learned to avoid the land-mines. In the past I have had to do lots of :

re:6.2 vs 6.1 and ipchains

2000-04-17 Thread David Yates
Gustav Schaffter wrote: The only thing that bugs me is that they crunched my /etc/ppp/ip-up.local and /etc/ppp/ip-down.local files with some stupid ISDN stuff. There went my ipchains scripts down the drain. (Luckily, I had a backup that wasn't too old.) I immediately reported it to

Re: 6.2 vs 6.1

2000-04-16 Thread Thomas Ribbrock \(Design/DEG\)
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 03:29:11PM -0400, David Yates wrote: Does anybody here wish they had not upgraded from 6.1 to 6.2? I have been using redhat since 4.0, and this is the first new version that I have been unhappy with. It sort of seems like a downgrade for me. Could you please

Re: 6.2 vs 6.1

2000-04-16 Thread David Yates
I agree with you about 6.2 appearing quite stable. I guess it's the desktops, (enlightenment and kde both are not uptodate, orcomplete) and applications that seem cut back from previous versions. It just seems like all I got was 6.1 with fixes. I had that before I went to 6.2., I actually had

RE: 6.2 vs 6.1

2000-04-16 Thread Tom Copeland
FWIW, we are running RH 6.2 AOLServer and have been pretty happy with it so far... Tom -Original Message- From: David Yates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 3:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 6.2 vs 6.1 Does anybody here wish they had not upgraded from

Re: 6.2 vs 6.1

2000-04-16 Thread Graham Hemmings
At 15:29 12/04/00 -0400, you wrote: Does anybody here wish they had not upgraded from 6.1 to 6.2? I have been using redhat since 4.0, and this is the first new version that I have been unhappy with. It sort of seems like a downgrade for me. --- David S. Yates' Lotta Linux Links

Re: 6.2 vs 6.1

2000-04-16 Thread dsyates
Alright alright I take it all back:-) I think it may have been just me. I have tried Suse 6.4 RH 6.2 and Mandrake 7.0 all since Monday. I am back with Redhat. I think 6.2 felt smaller to, like they had removed some stuff since 6.1. I am gonna stick with RedHat though. Out of the 3

Re: 6.2 vs 6.1

2000-04-15 Thread jack wallen jr
what has made you unhappy about 6.2? see what you said. :Does anybody here wish they had not upgraded from 6.1 to 6.2? :I have been using redhat since 4.0, and this is the first new version that I :have been unhappy with. :It sort of seems like a downgrade for me.

Re: 6.2 vs 6.1

2000-04-15 Thread Rick Forrister
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Does anybody here wish they had not upgraded from 6.1 to 6.2? I have been using redhat since 4.0, and this is the first new version that I have been unhappy with. It sort of seems like a downgrade for me. Nope. Curious why you feel it's a downgrade. rp3 now works

Re: 6.2 vs 6.1

2000-04-15 Thread Timothy Reaves
David Yates wrote: Does anybody here wish they had not upgraded from 6.1 to 6.2? I have been using redhat since 4.0, and this is the first new version that I have been unhappy with. It sort of seems like a downgrade for me. Yes! Well, more specifically, I was I had not upgraded from 6.0 to

Re: 6.2 vs 6.1

2000-04-15 Thread Peter Blomgren
David, Does anybody here wish they had not upgraded from 6.1 to 6.2? I have been using redhat since 4.0, and this is the first new version that I have been unhappy with. It sort of seems like a downgrade for me. That's an interesting statement. Can you elaborate? I've been around since

RE: 6.2 vs 6.1

2000-04-15 Thread Manuel Antonio Camacho Quesada
I have not used 6.1. But 6.2 looks pretty good to me. In fact, it has some improvements over 6.0 that I really like. -Manuel. Does anybody here wish they had not upgraded from 6.1 to 6.2? I have been using redhat since 4.0, and this is the first new version that I have been unhappy with.

Re: 6.2 vs 6.1

2000-04-15 Thread Gustav Schaffter
David, The only thing that bugs me is that they crunched my /etc/ppp/ip-up.local and /etc/ppp/ip-down.local files with some stupid ISDN stuff. There went my ipchains scripts down the drain. (Luckily, I had a backup that wasn't too old.) I immediately reported it to bugzilla. It's 'assigned'.

6.2 vs 6.1

2000-04-13 Thread David Yates
Does anybody here wish they had not upgraded from 6.1 to 6.2? I have been using redhat since 4.0, and this is the first new version that I have been unhappy with. It sort of seems like a downgrade for me. --- David S. Yates' Lotta Linux Links http://dsyates.home.mindspring.com