On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Jared Brick wrote:
> Is there a way around portmapper on 7.2? It seems that Nautilus/KDE both use
> the File Alteration Monitor which is dependent on portmap...is there a way
> around this so that I would not have to run portmap?
No, it's an RPC application. If you're wor
Great, thanks!
Jared
On Sunday 30 December 2001 21:02, you wrote:
> On Sunday 30 December 2001 08:59 pm, Jared Brick wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a way around portmapper on 7.2? It seems that Nautilus/KDE
> > both use the File Alteration Monitor which is dependent on portmap...is
> > there a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 30 December 2001 08:59 pm, Jared Brick wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way around portmapper on 7.2? It seems that Nautilus/KDE
> both use the File Alteration Monitor which is dependent on portmap...is
> there a way around this so that I would n
Hi,
Is there a way around portmapper on 7.2? It seems that Nautilus/KDE both use
the File Alteration Monitor which is dependent on portmap...is there a way
around this so that I would not have to run portmap?
Thanks in advance,
Jared
___
Redhat-li
