-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, CDitty wrote:
Why is this a bad idea? This is what I do on all my other lists and it
works great.
Because the List-Id header is already there for just this purpose. It's
generally hidden from humans but always available to mail
CDitty wrote:
Why is this a bad idea? This is what I do on all my other lists and it
works great.
Adding tags like [redhat-list] to the subject line causes difficulties to
most email readers for threaded views of the email list. If the
References: entry at the head of the email were
Why is this a bad idea? This is what I do on all my other lists and it
works great.
Chris
At 11:27 AM 2/4/2002, you wrote:
Therefore it's easier to sort them in some mailboxes (especially
trash), so that we can easily delete the old redhat stuff but still
keep old personal/other mails.
On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 11:33, CDitty wrote:
Why is this a bad idea? This is what I do on all my other lists and it
works great.
opinion
I think it is a bad idea since it seems like we went through this a year
or so ago when Red Hat switched over to listman. I find it visually
dificult to
I use Sylpheed, and all I did was ask it to filter on the to field. I get the
occasional slips (also from the Mandrake Expert list) but I think this is because
there is some other entry in the TO field.
I must admit that with the mislaid emails that do not get filtered and thus stay in
the
Redhat list Admin and other Redhat list members,
I would like if all email headers from this list can have a distinct
prepend like [REDHAT-LIST] - original title.
Therefore it's easier to sort them in some mailboxes (especially trash), so
that we can easily delete the old redhat stuff but
Ezra Nugroho [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Redhat list Admin and other Redhat list members,
I would like if all email headers from this list can have a distinct
prepend like [REDHAT-LIST] - original title.
Those prefixes are Evil.
Therefore it's easier to sort them in some mailboxes
Quoting Ezra Nugroho [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Redhat list Admin and other Redhat list members,
I would like if all email headers from this list can have a distinct
prepend like [REDHAT-LIST] - original title.
Therefore it's easier to sort them in some mailboxes (especially trash),
so
that we
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 12:09:33PM -0500, Ezra Nugroho wrote:
Redhat list Admin and other Redhat list members,
I would like if all email headers from this list can have a distinct
prepend like [REDHAT-LIST] - original title.
Therefore it's easier to sort them in some mailboxes (especially
Yeah, I was warned that this would be a touchy issue
I did set some filters, but once they are in my trash box, I cannot sort
them anymore.
That's fine guys, it's my problem, not yours.
If bandwith consumption is the main issue, not snipping the original when
replying (like what I don't
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 12:09:33PM -0500, Ezra Nugroho wrote:
Redhat list Admin and other Redhat list members,
I would like if all email headers from this list can have a distinct
prepend like [REDHAT-LIST] - original title.
Therefore it's easier to sort them in some mailboxes (especially
On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 11:27, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
Ezra Nugroho [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Redhat list Admin and other Redhat list members,
I would like if all email headers from this list can have a distinct
prepend like [REDHAT-LIST] - original title.
Those prefixes are
At 12:41 PM 2/4/2002 -0600, you wrote:
That it's a bad idea (I don't administer this list, though). Sort on
the List-Id: header.
Can this be done with Eudora/windows? Surley you can sort/filter on the
To: . Now if you were using a linux box to read your mail I would
suggest using procmail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ezra Nugroho wrote:
If bandwith consumption is the main issue, not snipping the original when
replying (like what I don't do in this email) is what you ought to be
concern with.
This junk bellow is definitelly larger than 13 bytes.
budda-bing.
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 12:41:28PM -0600, Bret Hughes wrote:
Can this be done with Eudora/windows? Surley you can sort/filter on the
To: . Now if you were using a linux box to read your mail I would
suggest using procmail to place your emails in seperate folders before
your MUA even sees
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 12:41:28PM -0600, Bret Hughes wrote:
Can this be done with Eudora/windows? Surley you can sort/filter on the
To: . Now if you were using a linux box to read your mail I would
suggest using procmail to place your emails in seperate folders before
your MUA even sees
On 12:41 04 Feb 2002, Bret Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Mon, 2002-02-04 at 11:27, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
| Ezra Nugroho [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I would like if all email headers from this list can have a distinct
| prepend like [REDHAT-LIST] - original title.
| Those
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Cameron Simpson wrote:
| That it's a bad idea (I don't administer this list, though). Sort on
| the List-Id: header.
|
| Can this be done with Eudora/windows?
On List-Id:? I don't think so. But...
[snip]
Yes, you can. The
On 02/04/02, 12:27:23PM -0500, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
Ezra Nugroho [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like if all email headers from this list can have a distinct
prepend like [REDHAT-LIST] - original title.
Those prefixes are Evil.
Agreed. Except they keep our regex/sed skills
19 matches
Mail list logo
