> 'Course that's just my impression from the above post, not
> knowing anything about OpenMail, but one could reasonably
> infer, I think, that the aforementioned product is NOT an
> "open source" product. :-)
> John
The "open" in the openmail name does not mean "opensource". It means it's
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Eric Wood wrote:
> By knowing this about HP's OpenMail product:
>
> Q: "But any "generic" IMAP server can talk to Outlook, can't it?"
> A: "Yes and no: there are several flavors of Outlook. The full, "corporate"
> Outlook clients use a set of APIs known as MAPI. Only OpenMail
By knowing this about HP's OpenMail product:
Q: "But any "generic" IMAP server can talk to Outlook, can't it?"
A: "Yes and no: there are several flavors of Outlook. The full, "corporate"
Outlook clients use a set of APIs known as MAPI. Only OpenMail can connect
corporate Outlook to a UNIX server
