On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Frank C. Brants wrote:
> Love this part, may I use it?
This is more likely to annoy the right people:
Spammers will want to mine the following addresses, which belong to the
senators in the Senate Commerce Committee:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
I thought that was good too.
Bret
"Frank C. Brants" wrote:
> At 01:17 PM 01/22/2000 , Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
> >Nevertheless, spammers trying to auto-extract addresses from this message
> >will definitely want to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Love this part, may I u
At 01:17 PM 01/22/2000 , Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote:
>Nevertheless, spammers trying to auto-extract addresses from this message
>will definitely want to include [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Love this part, may I use it?
Thanks!!
Franko
Frank C. Brants
Netopia, Inc.
Systems Enginee
On Sat, Jan 22, 2000 at 09:33:38AM -0600, scott.list wrote:
> Every user on my system got this message today. I don't see exactly how it
> was delivered, it has no to addresses. Is there something I can
> do/configure to prevent this type of message being passed along to my users?
> I'm using se
On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, scott.list wrote:
> Every user on my system got this message today. I don't see exactly how it
> was delivered, it has no to addresses.
mail doesn't need to addresses.
The thing that really matters for mail is the stuff that is passed to the
SMTP server; stuff like
telnet
Every user on my system got this message today. I don't see exactly how it
was delivered, it has no to addresses. Is there something I can
do/configure to prevent this type of message being passed along to my users?
I'm using sendmail, RH6.0 with updates, info as follows:
Version 8.9.3
Compiled
