* Bruce Richardson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 20 Dec, Tom Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > Urm, if you look more closely at the top output (I presume you used
> > top), you'll see that nearly all the memory used by applets is shared.
> > If you don't understand, or are misinterpretting the output of t
On 20 Dec, Tom Gilbert wrote:
>
> Urm, if you look more closely at the top output (I presume you used
> top), you'll see that nearly all the memory used by applets is shared.
> If you don't understand, or are misinterpretting the output of top,
> please see http://www.tomgilbert.freeserve.co.uk/t
* Jyan-Min Fang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> My experience with gnome (on redhat 6.0) was that it initially ran fine,
> but after a few days, it felt really sluggish. I don't think the memory
> usage was the culprit, since free showed I still had many free memory
> available. I recalled some artic
* Bruce Richardson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I had a look at Gnome at the beginning of the year and thought it was
> too buggy to bother with. Since upgrading to 6.1 the other week I
> thought I'd check it out again. It's a lot more stable but I was
> HORRIFIED to see how much memory it consu
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Jyan-Min Fang wrote:
> My experience with gnome (on redhat 6.0) was that it initially ran fine,
> but after a few days, it felt really sluggish. I don't think the memory
> usage was the culprit, since free showed I still had many free memory
> available. I recalled some artic
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Jyan-Min Fang wrote:
> My experience with gnome (on redhat 6.0) was that it initially ran fine,
> but after a few days, it felt really sluggish. I don't think the memory
> usage was the culprit, since free showed I still had many free memory
> available. I recalled some artic
My experience with gnome (on redhat 6.0) was that it initially ran fine,
but after a few days, it felt really sluggish. I don't think the memory
usage was the culprit, since free showed I still had many free memory
available. I recalled some article claimed imlib was the main reason for
this probl
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> There are *applets* that
> take up more memory then the whole of WindowMaker (my wm of choice).
>
> Is there any good reason for this bloat?
It's at least partially caused by the heavy usage of CORBA.
This memory usage is the precise reason why the
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> I had a look at Gnome at the beginning of the year and thought it was
> too buggy to bother with. Since upgrading to 6.1 the other week I
> thought I'd check it out again. It's a lot more stable but I was
> HORRIFIED to see how much memory it consu
I had a look at Gnome at the beginning of the year and thought it was
too buggy to bother with. Since upgrading to 6.1 the other week I
thought I'd check it out again. It's a lot more stable but I was
HORRIFIED to see how much memory it consumes. There are *applets* that
take up more memory the
10 matches
Mail list logo
