At 07:04 PM 4/30/98 +0100, Eze Ogwuma wrote:
>
>Try tkinfo if you don't like Emacs.
Thank you, tkinfo is just what I was looking for.
Al Margheim
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailin
Al Margheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 03:36 PM 4/30/98 +0100, James Youngman wrote:
> >
> >The X version of info(1) is Emacs.
>
> So I could trade the cryptic command set of info for the cryptic command
> set of Emacs? H.
No. It's still the info command set but you get a more
At 03:36 PM 4/30/98 +0100, James Youngman wrote:
>
>The X version of info(1) is Emacs.
So I could trade the cryptic command set of info for the cryptic command
set of Emacs? H.
Thanks anyway. :-)
Al
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
htt
> "Al" == Al Margheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Al> I have to admit that I find the info command set less than
Al> intuitive, and I don't use it enough to make its command set
Al> second nature. Is there an X version with menus available, or
Al> some other alternative that would ma
I have to admit that I find the info command set less than intuitive, and I
don't use it enough to make its command set second nature. Is there an X
version with menus available, or some other alternative that would make it
easier to navigate through info documents?
TIA,
Al Margheim
--
PLE
