Re: Mail Server for home network [THANKS]

2002-11-06 Thread Edward Dekkers
> I'm not set on how to achieve dial on demand functionality. Might pick up on advice from Edward Dekkers to use a combination of wvdial and pppd, although diald looks good in principle. Like I said, don't get me wrong - I LOVE diald. Just haven't been able to get it working on recent versions of

RE: Mail Server for home network [THANKS]

2002-11-06 Thread Roland Hill
From: Gary [mailto:gary-list-redhat@;mygirlfriday.info] Sent: Wednesday, 6 November 2002 6:24 p.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Mail Server for home network [THANKS] On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:33:47PM +1300 or thereabouts, Roland Hill wrote: > Thanks to those who replied. You knowledgeab

Re: Mail Server for home network [THANKS]

2002-11-05 Thread Gary
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:33:47PM +1300 or thereabouts, Roland Hill wrote: > Thanks to those who replied. You knowledgeable types really do make a difference to >those of us who are trying to get up to speed. > > Now for the implementation phase. Well, what did you finally select ?

RE: Mail Server for home network [THANKS]

2002-11-05 Thread Roland Hill
Thanks to those who replied. You knowledgeable types really do make a difference to those of us who are trying to get up to speed. Now for the implementation phase. Regards, Roland Hill # This e-mail me