> they didn't give them the
> up time they required to run their business.
>
> There is an article out on the internet somewhere
> about this.
>
> Kevin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Cannon, Andrew
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:
-
From: Cannon, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 August 2003 08:16
To: Redhat (E-mail)
Subject: Microsoft Linux???
http://www.internetweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=13100775
I still don't believe it!!!
Andy
Andrew Cannon, Nuclear Technology (J2), NNC Ltd, Booths
http://www.internetweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=13100775
I still don't believe it!!!
Andy
Andrew Cannon, Nuclear Technology (J2), NNC Ltd, Booths Hall, Knutsford,
Cheshire, WA16 8QZ.
Telephone; +44 (0) 1565 843768
email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NNC website: http://www.nnc.co.uk
Title: Microsoft Linux ??
http://asia.cnn.com/2002/TECH/biztech/12/10/meta.linux.reut/index.html
Regards,
Zoki wrote:
> *** Here's the exact error message I get when I try to install vmware on a
> Mandrake 6.0 with the 2.2.9-27mdk kernel version compiled for the i686.
>
> ### ERROR ###
>
> Enter binaries installation directory: [/usr/loc
On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Zoki wrote:
->On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, T. S. Collins wrote:
->
->->Zoki wrote:
->->
->->> It's the Mandrake 6.0 distrib which should be equal to RH6. Vmware doesn't
->->> install on it because half way it complains about wrong version of make
->->> (don't have the exact error mess
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, T. S. Collins wrote:
->Zoki wrote:
->
->> It's the Mandrake 6.0 distrib which should be equal to RH6. Vmware doesn't
->> install on it because half way it complains about wrong version of make
->> (don't have the exact error message). At this point I was wondering if
->> ther
On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Leonid Mamtchenkov wrote:
->Hello Zoki,
->
->Once you wrote about "VMware (Was "Microsoft Linux? This is a JOKE?")":
->>
->> Thanks to my NT Admin. who sabotaged the perfectly working Linux box I had
->> running at work by bl
Thank you for the explanation :)
--
Michael S. Dunsavage
"Linux: the operating system with a CLUE...
Command Line User Environment".
(seen in a posting in comp.software.testing)
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, T. S. Collins wrote:
> Zoki wrote:
>
> > It's the Mandrake 6.0 distrib which should be equa
On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 10:17:58PM -0500, Michael S. Dunsavage wrote:
> call me an idiotwhat is vmware
A Virtual Machine for running other operating systems within
an environment that they THINK is a physical machine but is really a
virtualized abstraction hosted on the Linux system.
> call me an idiotwhat is vmware
Idiot. http://www.vmware.com/
It's a virtual machine type thing .. nifty, if a little slow.
Cheers,
--
Iain Wade - Optus Internet
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
Zoki wrote:
> It's the Mandrake 6.0 distrib which should be equal to RH6. Vmware doesn't
> install on it because half way it complains about wrong version of make
> (don't have the exact error message). At this point I was wondering if
> there's a known issue with VMware and RH6? What's your mana
call me an idiotwhat is vmware
--
Michael S. Dunsavage
"Linux: the operating system with a CLUE...
Command Line User Environment".
(seen in a posting in comp.software.testing)
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Zoki wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Jerry Winegarden wrote:
>
>
>
> ->manager. idiot. o
Hello Zoki,
Once you wrote about "VMware (Was "Microsoft Linux? This is a JOKE?")":
>
> Thanks to my NT Admin. who sabotaged the perfectly working Linux box I had
> running at work by blocking it's access to the rest of the companies
> network and by switc
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Jerry Winegarden wrote:
->manager. idiot. oxymoron? (My present manager excluded, of course. He
->runs linux everywhere and NT under vmware)
*** Jerry,
Thanks to my NT Admin. who sabotaged the perfectly working Linux box I had
running at work by blocking it's access to
It is a great joke. Thanks, I needed a good laugh. Funny, but not as
funny, in a perverse sort of way was the resulting discussion thread.
The best quote, of course was from Foghorn Leghorn: "It's a joke, son."
I would have hoped to leave this one to die out, but I can't keep myself
from a coupl
> is/was (as far as I'm told by people that have used it). Microsoft have
> dropped os/2? What's that got to do with it? Maybe they thought that
> they would be better off sticking to just two os's: windows 95 and NT.
Uh, AFAICR, Microsoft left OS/2 to IBM (which, as has been mentioned before,
wa
I intend this to be my last post to the list for this thread. Anyone can
follow it up directly if they wish.
Joseph Wagner wrote:
>
> Windows 3.1 was not an OS. Windows 3.1 was a program which rode on top of a
> one-task OS (DOS).
yeah, yeah, I know. The point still holds though: Microsoft alr
Continuing in the thread of an extremely off topic subject...
This is regarding some intellectual property nits that can apply to
all Trademarks, Microsoft, IBM, and RedHat included. Based on THAT
stretch of the imagination, here we go...
On Sun, Nov 28, 1999 at 02:28:11PM +, John Me
At 01:44 AM 11/28/99 -0500, you wrote:
>copyright infringement on who?
>
>--
>Michael S. Dunsavage
>
Microsoft, specifically, misrepresentation of their product. You can do a
satire of McDonalds, but you had best beware that nobody could get the
impression just looking at the article that Microso
Any chance of limiting the discussion here to Linux ...
this nonsense is such a waste of space ...
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, November 28, 1999 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: Microsoft Linux?Th
On Sun, 28 Nov 1999 14:32:51 -0600, Joseph Wagner wrote:
>Windows 3.1 was not an OS. Windows 3.1 was a program which rode on top of a
>one-task OS (DOS).
>
>Microsoft dropped OS/2 WARP and fled from it at the speed of light (no pun
>intended).
MS had 'fled' from OS/2 long before it became War
>Microsoft dropped OS/2 WARP and fled from it at the speed of light (no pun
>intended
yeh right! :)
--
Iain Wade - Optus Internet
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
Windows 3.1 was not an OS. Windows 3.1 was a program which rode on top of a
one-task OS (DOS).
Microsoft dropped OS/2 WARP and fled from it at the speed of light (no pun
intended). Microsoft has stubbornly stood behind Win95/98. Discuss the OS
in use and backed by Microsoft, not what could hav
the only thing funnier than reading that site is listening to
everyone debate why it's wrong.
I particularily liked all the quotes off on the left.
Hehe
Jason- who got the joke.
--
Make it myself? But I'm a physical organic chemist!
Visit the Dorm Room Life may n
> I personally don't think that's a very good arguement.
I second that...
> Second, Microsoft DID release a multitasking os for the pc platform
> (xenix, that's already been discussed earlier in the thread), but
> thought that DOS would be the way to go.
Lest we forget, there was OS/2 1.3 and W
I personally don't think that's a very good arguement.
first: X-windows isn't owned by Linux. And linux isn't the only
multitasking os around (try freebsd, solaris, irix, sunos, minix to name
a few), and it would take more than two years to produce windows from
Linux. Windows 95 was probably bui
This is a big, brilliant joke. However, if you want a serious talk about
copyright infringements, you should check out this article at:
http://www.osopinion.com/Opinions/TechnoJoe/TechnoJoe1.html
It's a slick idea.
Thanks for your time.
Joe Wagner
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
epresentation.
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, November 27, 1999 9:38 PM
> Subject: Re: Microsoft Linux?This is a JOKE?
>
>
> > This is also damn close to copyright infring
Strike that, this is copyright infringement and misrepresentation.
- Original Message -
From: "John Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 1999 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: Microsoft Linux?This is a JOKE?
> This is als
This is also damn close to copyright infringement.
- Original Message -
From: "Wayne Dyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 1999 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: Microsoft Linux?This is a JOKE?
> Wellington Terumi Uemura wrote:
&
Wellington Terumi Uemura wrote:
> http://www.mslinux.org/
>
> I've found this strange,link,this is a joke right
> Can be!
Read it. It's loaded with clues.
-W-
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
This, I'm sure like the 14 million timmes this was asked, is a joke.
--
Michael S. Dunsavage
"Linux: the operating system with a CLUE...
Command Line User Environment".
(seen in a posting in comp.software.testing)
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Wellington Terumi Uemura wrote:
> http://www.mslinux.org
On Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 03:31:52AM -0800, Wellington Terumi Uemura wrote:
: http://www.mslinux.org/
:
: I've found this strange,link,this is a joke right
: Can be!
Uh, did you even READ the quotes on the left side of the page? You decide.
--
Jason Costomiris <><
Corel
is doing?
-Mensaje original-
De: rpjday [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: Viernes 26 de Noviembre de 1999 09:26 AM
Para: Marco van Tol
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; recipient list not shown: ;
Asunto: RE: Microsoft Linux?This is a JOKE?
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Marco van
: Wellington Terumi Uemura [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: Viernes 26 de Noviembre de 1999 05:32 AM
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Microsoft Linux?This is a JOKE?
http://www.mslinux.org/
I've found this strange,link,this is a joke right
C
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Marco van Tol wrote:
> > well, microsoft DID come out with the first unix on the pc platform.
> > xenix or something like that. but dos was obviously a better option, so
> > they stuck with that...
> Was that really Microsofts?
> I have used it briefly in the past and was to
> well, microsoft DID come out with the first unix on the pc platform.
> xenix or something like that. but dos was obviously a better option, so
> they stuck with that...
Was that really Microsofts?
I have used it briefly in the past and was told it was owned by Santa Cruz
Operations?
I might be
well, microsoft DID come out with the first unix on the pc platform.
xenix or something like that. but dos was obviously a better option, so
they stuck with that...
or so I've been told by a reliable source...
sugarboy
rpjday wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Wellington Terumi Uemura wrote:
>
>
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Wellington Terumi Uemura wrote:
> http://www.mslinux.org/
>
> I've found this strange,link,this is a joke right
Sure - Microsoft's Justice Department isn't anywhere near as good as the
site it's pointing to. ;)
LLaP
bero
--
Nobody will ever need more than 640 kB RAM.
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Wellington Terumi Uemura wrote:
> http://www.mslinux.org/
>
> I've found this strange,link,this is a joke right
> Can be!
of course it's a joke. sheesh.
rday
p.s. but a pretty good joke.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject
http://www.mslinux.org/
I've found this strange,link,this is a joke right
Can be!
__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
42 matches
Mail list logo
