On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 11:40:01PM -0400, Statux wrote:
WindowMaker is one of the best out there. :)
However, the 0.62.x versions tend to have problems with 8bit displays -
there has been a lot of talk about this on the mailing lists.
Unfortunately, 0.62.x also fix some annoying buglets which
unfortunately? sounds pretty good to me :)
Who uses 8bit anymore? :)
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Chip Rose. wrote:
Which window manager is rated as the most stable?
I like Blackbox because it's fast and seems a lot more stable than KDE.
Any other suggestions?
Blackbox has some very nice graphics.
In addition to the suggestions which have been made (all good so
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Thomas R. Shannon wrote:
In addition to the suggestions which have been made (all good so far),
I can say that once set up, Sawfish has never crashed on me. That's
saying quite a bit for such a young program.
I run GNOME with Sawfish but I'm also going to chime in
Which window manager is rated as the most stable?
I like Blackbox because it's fast and seems a lot more stable than KDE.
Any other suggestions?
Thanks,
Chip Rose.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 04:43:06AM +, Chip Rose. wrote:
Which window manager is rated as the most stable?
twm. It comes standard with the X. It's very stable because it is
very simple and hasn't changed much in 10 years.
I like Blackbox because it's fast and seems a lot more stable than
WindowMaker is one of the best out there. :)
On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Chip Rose. wrote:
Which window manager is rated as the most stable?
I like Blackbox because it's fast and seems a lot more stable than KDE.
Any other suggestions?
Thanks,
Chip Rose.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
